BSBKJVWEBYLTASVBBEWMBT4TDBY|HymnsMusicDonate
Menu
General

William Branham's Prophesy of a Woman President?

sermonindex Oct 20, 2016

It seems that in the early 1930's a preacher by the name of William Branham gave a prophetic word that the last President or leader of America would be a woman. That under her reign or influence America would fall.

In light of the very real possibility that Hillary Rodham Clinton could be the next President. Should we attach credibility to the prophecy by William Branham?

-bbs-

sermonindex Oct 20, 2016

Double Post

G
ginnyrose Oct 20, 2016

As I recall, William Branham was considered a false prophet. I also know false prophets can be right at times but whether he is this time - that Hillary would become president - I do not know. He did prophesy the USA would end in 1977...

In any case, our country is in dire straits and do wonder how much longer God is going is going to allow people to mock him, spit in his face. After I decided that our country cannot go any lower then what it is now, I read an article that detailed the depravity that characterized Roman culture when Jesus came and the disciples went out to evangelize. Then I learned it could get worse. About makes me puke...

Sandra

sermonindex Oct 20, 2016

Sister I did some Googling and agree with you. It seems this man did get off into some flaky stuff and give some prophetic words which would did not come to pass. Not saying that he is right in this case either.

But I'm just starting to learn that even some of our respected Bible teachers are embracing error. John MacArthur believes that if one takes the mark get the end times they still can be saved. So even our most trusted Bible teachers can be wrong at times. This is attaching no credibility to William Branham. But yet one certainly must Wonder.

-bbs-

A
AbideinHim Oct 20, 2016

"John MacArthur believes that if one takes the mark get the end times they still can be saved. "

Disclaimer: As long as they don't speak in tongues.

W
wayneman Oct 20, 2016

Branham said he received the sevenfold vision in 1933 but didn't put it in print until 1965. It is...

1. Mussolini would conquer Ethiopia, but then die a horrible death at the hands of his own people.

2. America would be drawn into a world war against Germany which would be headed up by the Austrian, Adolph Hitler, who would be vanquished and come to a mysterious end.

3. The third part of the vision showed that though there were three isms, Fascism, Nazism, Communism in the world, the first two would come to nothing but that Communism would flourish.

4. The fourth vision showed an egg-shaped car with a glass bubble roof which drove itself as the passengers played some kind of game. (Google has developed a self-driving car projected to hit the market by 2017-20.)

5. The fifth scene had to do with the disappearance of modesty. He saw a woman, fully dressed at first, but her clothing became increasingly revealing until she was wearing nothing but a G-string, or as he put it, "a little fig leaf type apron.”

6. There will arise over America a beautiful but cruel woman of great power and terrible splendor. Branham suggested three interpretations of this femme fatale: 1) The Roman Catholic Church, 2) a female president, 3) a symbol of womankind overthrowing God-ordained gender roles and dominating men.

7. "In the last and seventh vision I heard a terrible explosion. As I turned to look I saw nothing but debris, craters and smoke all over the land of America.”

Last year I wrote an article on Branham and posted it here on SI.

https://www.sermonindex.net/modules/newbb/viewtopic.php?topic_id=54919&forum=40

S
savannah Oct 21, 2016


"Let the dead bury the dead."

Let this false prophets false prophecies be buried in the grave along with him!

There are enough false prophets spewing out their false prophecies in the here and now, don't bring this one back from the dead.

"Learn of Me", Jesus said!

W
wayneman Oct 21, 2016

Dead? If you had read my article you would have learned about The Second Coming of Branham, which will occur on an unspecified Easter Sunday in Jeffersonville, Indiana.

(If SI enabled emoticons, I would insert a smiley here.)

Branham was not a gospel preacher, since all his sermons were about himself, but he certainly was an interesting character--one of the many unsavory but colorful characters produced by American revivalism.

D
dohzman Oct 21, 2016

Branham used to have healing lines and the people would fill out a card request for healings, on one meeting 2 ministers decided to expose him as false and both falsely fill out healing cards and stood in line, when Branham received the one ministers card he declared that the minister had to have been mistaken because none of the illnesses listed on that card were present, the minister admittedly denied Branham and called him a false prophet publically, to which Branham than pronounced to that minister that those things he wrote on that card were now on him, that minister feel over dead, the second minister came forward in fear and repented. That was related to me by eye witnesses who used to be part of his church there in Indiana. There are some old news paper articles archived that do suggest that an incident similar to that did indeed happen. I personally am very very slow to say someone is false, unless I see worldly greed as part of their real life message and life style. When it comes to prophesy there is a great deal of room for misinterpretation even when the actual vision or dream is real and legitimate. I am not so sure I would be to quick to throw the baby out with the bath water. Just saying:/

L
Lysa Oct 21, 2016

by AbideinHim
Reply To This Post |
"John MacArthur believes that if one takes the mark get the end times they still can be saved. "

Disclaimer: As long as they don't speak in tongues.


LOLOL I was eating when I read this and almost choked on the food!! You made my day!!

A
AbideinHim Oct 21, 2016

"Branham was the pioneer and de facto leader of the infamous Voice of Healing movement: a college of money-grubbers, alcoholics, womanizers and charlatans including Jim Jones, Oral Roberts and the appropriately-named A.A. Allen. He was the first modern faith healer. It was he who devised the standard healing meeting: the sick are called forth from the audience, their malady revealed by "word of knowledge,” prayed for and pronounced "healed.” Many whom Branham pronounced healed were not healed. Though he may have been honest, sincere and morally upright, his legacy to the church is a malignant one. All the worst manifestations of American Pentecostalism ”“ the Trinity Broadcast Network, PTL Club, Oral Roberts University and the Jonestown massacre ”“ bear Branham’s imprimatur. It was he who introduced to Pentecostalism the Apostolic Superman: the miracle-working spiritual giant "untainted by the world, the flesh and the devil.” And what Supermen we’ve had, from Jim Jones to Robert Tilton. This race of Supermen has plagued Pentecostalism with scandal from the Voice of Healing era till now.
At the head of the stream of Pentecostalism that produced televangelism, the prosperity gospel, the Manifest Sons of God and the New Apostolic Reformation stands William Marion Branham."


Wayne,

I don't know which heresy hunter website that you got your information from, but you are way off base.

In the 40's and 50's, there was a great healing revival that took place, and the men that you mentioned with the exception of Jim Jones were all called of God and anointed with the gifts of healing and working of miracles. Many of these healings were recorded in the "Voice of Healing" publication. Every one of these men that you referred to preached the gospel of Jesus Christ and there were many souls that were saved as a result of their crusades. It is true that the truth of divine healing was emphasized in their meetings and that was because they were all called to a healing ministry, and the Spirit of God was being manifested through divine healing during this move of God.

Gordon Lindsay, who published "The Voice of Healing" was sound in the Word of God and he was William Branham's campaign manager. William Branham was a humble servant of the Lord, but he strayed from the will of God because he got out of his calling as a prophet of God and began to teach the Word of God, and he was never called to be a teacher. Gordon Lindsay warned him that he was in error, but Branham did not heed Brother Lindsay's admonition. Then William Branham started listening to men that got him in to even deeper error.

A.A. Allen was another man of God that was used in healing ministry that apparently slipped into alcoholism toward the end of his life. I met A.A. Allen's organ player at a meeting in a AOG church and asked him about Brother Allen's alcoholism, and he told me that he never saw A.A. Allen drunk. R. W. Shambach sat under the ministry of A.A. Allen and shared many wonderful things that God did during this time.

Oral Roberts was another man of God that was greatly used by God in the days of the healing revival in the 40's and 50's. I believe that Oral Roberts also got off on some of his teachings, but it does not nullify what God did through him during the years of the healing revival.

To compare these men to Jim Jones is erroneous. These men preached a strange gospel to those who do not believe in healing, miracles, signs, and wonders as being an intricate part of the preaching of the gospel of Jesus Christ. Much of this unbelief comes from the Cesationists.

W
wayneman Oct 21, 2016

Mike,

Did you notice the pattern in your biographical sketches of these "men of God?" They all started well, but then Branham "strayed," Allen "slipped," Oral Roberts "got off." The whole movement ended badly because "a bad tree bears bad fruit." (Matt. 7:17)

N
narrowpath Oct 21, 2016

I agree with Mike in this.

Derek Prince said about Branham that he had a genuine gift of God but he was also under the influence of dark forces.

Yesterday we discussed the records of some of the judges mentioned in Hebrew 11 in our house group. These were people with obvious flaws but God wrought salvation for Israel through them.

Why did God give Rahab, Samson, Gideon, Jephtah a place of honor in the bible?

Could God not have chosen better men and women? They had faith, and God honors faith often despite of character flaws.

Working a miracle of God does not mean that God endorses your character. The righteous will live not by good works but by faith. This is scandalous to the human soul.

L
Lysa Oct 21, 2016


KJV - For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall shew great signs and wonders; insomuch that, if (it were) possible, they shall deceive the very elect. ~ Matt 24:24

"If ... possible, they shall deceive the very elect."

Derek Prince said about Branham that he had a genuine gift of God but he was also under the influence of dark forces.

Bros and sister's it is possible!

Why did God give Rahab, Samson, Gideon, Jephtah a place of honor in the bible?

By faith, praise God, they got a mention because I don't believe that it was that they were destined.

Do you know who wasn't mentioned in Heb 11? Definitely the one everyone thought would be in it.... Solomon.

EVeryone mentioned by Wayneman wasn't perfect but they did die with a shadow over their ministry. The elect can be deceived.

God bless,
Lisa

S
savannah Oct 22, 2016

If it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect - So nearly would their pretended miracles resemble true miracles as to render it difficult to detect the imposture; so much so, that if it were possible they would persuade even true Christians that they were the Messiah. But that was not possible. His real friends would be too firmly established in the belief that he was the Christ to be wholly led away by others. Christians may be sometimes led far astray; they may be in doubt about some great doctrines of religion; they may be perplexed by the cavils and cunning craftiness of those who do not love the truth, but they cannot be entirely deceived and seduced from the Saviour. Our Saviour says that if this "were possible," it would be done then; but it was not possible. A. Barnes

Desperate situations require a full use of all possible powers of persuasion: signs and wonders, or the pretence of them: easily accepted as such by a fanaticised multitude, and sometimes so clever and plausible as to tempt the wise to credence.””ὥστε, with infinitive to express tendency; often inclusive of result, but not here.””εἰ δυνατὸν, if possible, the implication being that it is not. If it were the consequence would be fatal. Expositors Greek Testament

εἰ δυνατὸν, if [it were] possible) This clause denotes the utmost endeavour, yet made in vain. Bengel


But they will never follow a stranger; in fact, they will run away from him because they do not recognize a stranger's voice." John 10:5

But a stranger will they by no means follow, for they know not the voice of strangers. The negative is strongly expressed. The sheep, who know their shepherd's voice, will not take the lead of a stranger or an alien; i.e. of a "thief or robber." Pulpit Commentary

And a stranger will they not follow. Better, But a stranger they will assuredly not follow. The form of negative is very strong, as in John 4:14; John 4:48, John 6:35; John 6:37, John 8:12; By ‘a stranger’ is meant quite literally anyone whom they do not know, not necessarily a thief or robber. Cambridge Bible

Lisa says, "The elect can be deceived."

But the Scriptures, which cannot be broken saith, "They Cannot!"

Thanks be to God!

Soli Deo Gloria!


W
wayneman Oct 22, 2016

True, even the great saints of the Bible sometimes had great flaws. "We all stumble in many things," which is precisely why men should not put themselves forward as Miracle-Working Apostolic Supermen and why the ones who do always come to a bad end. "Pride goes before a fall."

Anyway, whether we endorse Branham or not, the last four points of his prophecy are certainly intriguing. The one Blaine asked about is...

6. There will arise over America a beautiful but cruel woman of great power and terrible splendor. Branham suggested three interpretations of this femme fatale: 1) The Roman Catholic Church, 2) a female president, 3) a symbol of womankind overthrowing God-ordained gender roles and dominating men.

S
savannah Oct 22, 2016

"Anyway, whether we endorse Branham or not, the last four points of his prophecy are certainly intriguing."

It may be intriguing, but then, shouldn't we expect it to be. The enemy, that counterfeit, and father of lies, knows how to seduce, fascinate, and appeal to the curiosity of humanity. The spider's web will captivate as well as capture the unwary. Eve, nor any other, would have any interest in snake-versation, if there were no intriguing twists being performed on the stage of the dance-atorium.

Intriguing - to arouse the curiosity or interest of
by unusual, new, or otherwise fascinating or compelling qualities; appeal strongly to; captivate

Intriguing yes, validating no!

We are to entertain angels, not devils.

Bless the Lord O my soul and all that is within me, bless His Holy Name.

sermonindex Oct 22, 2016

Lisa,
You are absolutely correct, we understand what you are saying...that believers can be decieved and led astray from the truth.

"But I am afraid that, as the serpent deceived Eve by his craftiness, your minds will be led astray from the simplicity and purity of devotion to Christ." (”­2 Cor”¬ ”­11”¬:”­3”¬)

Sadly this happens far too often and once mighty men and women of God fall and succumb in the heat of the battle. We are not their judge and should not be their accuser. Those roles belong to God and the devil respectively.

Noone is perfect except of course those who operate the heresy hunter websites:-). I don't know which is worse, those who succumbed to the attack of the enemy and fell away from grace or those who seem to revel in uncovering the sins and faults of others while projecting that they themselves are without sin.

G
ginnyrose Oct 22, 2016

I am concerned not so much about Branhams prophecies - although that could be revealing in short order - as to whether he is from God or not. But am concerned about some doctrinal positions he embraced that are clearly off the wall.

QUOTE:
"The most controversial doctrine that William Branham taught is the "serpent seed" doctrine. Branham claimed that the fall of man in the Garden of Eden occurred after Eve had sexual intercourse with the serpent. The serpent was the missing link between man and ape and this allowed for the sexual interaction between it and Eve. Cain was the offspring of this interaction and thus carried the seed of Satan in him, the serpent's seed. The godly seed was carried on through Seth. The seed of Satan, present in Cain, was the cause of all civilization including the educational system and scientific development (Weaver, 113). It was the seduction of Eve by the serpent which started procreation through sexual intercourse as well as the presence of the seed of Satan in man."

Sounds like the guy had an active imagination or maybe it was inspired by the devil.

Sandra

T
twayneb Oct 22, 2016

A few observations:

Many men and women have begun ministry under the genuine anointing of the Holy Spirit and powerfully used of God only to lose out in the race later on. I remember reading about John Alexander Dowie. He decorated his church with sayings that were literally spelled out using crutches, braces, wheel chairs, and other devices that were left behind by people who were instantaneously healed in his services. Many people were saved and discipled. Yet he got off in the end and fell. The lesson here is that we must be very careful in our walk with the Lord to remain humble and submitted to God and fellow brothers and sisters in the Lord. Just because a man got off in the end does not discredit his ministry when He was being used of God.

Many men that were powerfully used of God had some quirky ideas about non-essential doctrines. As an example, one that was VERY common in many churches at one time was the idea that dark skinned people were a result of the curse on Ham. There is only one problem with this. There was no curse on Ham, it was on Canaan, and we know for sure that Canaan was not dark skinned as he was the father of the Canaanites. Now I know this was not an isolated "odd" idea held by just one or two, but many, many pastors and churches preached this. We acknowledge that this doctrine was absolutely unbiblical and one that should be strongly refuted. But we did not totally write off these pastors or churches as a result.

It is interesting to see Brahnam's prophecies in context and read the words as they were given. Who knows. We will see if they come to pass. Looks to me like some have already. He might have been totally wrong. But what I notice is that he did not say the last president would be female then America would be destroyed as a nation. We would have to read that into what he said.


This discussion is locked.

Archived
1 of 20 posts