Hi folks,
I am having the privillege to conduct a baptismal service in our church.
There are many details to go through, like pre-baptism talks to make sure the candidates have properly repented of their sins toward God and believe in the Son and surrendered they life to God.
My understanding is that baptism should be trinitarian, e.g. that we baptize in the name of the father, Son and Holy Ghost.
According to my understanding of scripture we should lay hands on those who where baptized to receive the Holy Spirit.
There are 3 references in Acts where this was done either before or after their water baptism.
Acts 8:17 Annanias laid hands on Paul to receive sight and the filling of the Holy Spirit prior to water baptism.
This was unusual because Paul's conversion was not done by direct evangelization but by a sovereign act of God.
Acts 9:17 Philippus the deacon went to Samaria to evangelize following a wave of persecution in Judaea and performed great miracles and baptized people. He had sat under the apostles teaching and was chosen out of thousands of candidates to be a deacon, he must have been found qualified because of an outstanding life testimony. Yet, being more a man of power and evangelism, he was not so much a man of precise doctrine as the apostles. So as the apostles heard about it, they came and fixed what was lacking. They laid on hands on the water-baptized believers for the filling of the Holy Spirit. The filling of the Spirit must have been something overwhelming and something that bystanders must have witnessed. Probably because they spoke in tongues or prophesied. Simon, the sorcerer knew about spirtitual matters so he coveted the gift.
Acts 19:6 the disciples of John in Ephesus. Again, here Paul fixed an issue relating to the not yet completed baptism of John.
All this was done by laying on of hands.
Now, here is the million dollar question:
Is the laying on of hands to receive the Holy Spirit a normative practise following water baptism, or is it only done to fix a problem of fill a gap?
