BSBKJVWEBYLTASVBBEWMBT4TDBY|HymnsMusicDonate
Menu
Theology

You don't go to hell becaus of sin!

L
Logic Jul 22, 2005

No one goes to hell because of there sins, but only for rejecting the sacrifice that Jesus paid on the cross, along with His resurrection. If they have accepted That sacrifise, along with His resurrection and repent from there sins, are they saved? Yes. death is not separation from God in Hell because paul said do die is gain. death is separation of body from soul, and you choose where you go. A person doesn't goes to hell because of sin, He dies because of it, For the wages of sin is death; and if he dies in his sin, then he will go to hell. Jesus died on the cross for all people and therefor all peoples' sins, even the people who will reject His sacrifice. But that is why they go to hell, not because of sin.

T
TiltedHalo Jul 22, 2005

I can agree on one point, that we choose where we go, in a sense. But I have to say that it is because of sin that we are promised the reward of hell. Yes the wages of sin is death, but you are taking upon a literal definition of "death". We die, because we die which roots in the original sin. Nevertheless, we die when the Soverign Lord decides that His plan for us on His earth is complete. There are consequences for every decision we make, the good, & the bad.Accepting Jesus' lordship & faith in Him & Him alone will grant us the promise of everlasting life with Him in heaven. Not accepting this gift, & continuing to live in sin is what demands a debt paid by being completely severed from the communion with God in everlasting purgatory.I believe it would be a false statement to claim "We don't go to hell because of sin." Yes one will be eternally damned if they rejected the diety of Christ & His saving message of grace, but that would only lead them to continue in sin, therefore, a price must be paid.

T
TiltedHalo Jul 22, 2005

Yes to die is to gain, if you are living in the light of Christ Jesus.

sermonindex Jul 22, 2005

No one goes to hell because of there sins,I am sorry to say but your thinking and explaining of hell and sin is very much off-base and not an correct interpretation of the revealed scriptures. The simple fact is that all have sinned and have fallen short of the glory of God. Hell was a place intially made for angels but fallen mankind that go in disobedience from God find their place there also."And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under darkness unto the judgement of the great day. Even as Sodom and Gomorrha, and the cities about them in like manner, giving themselves over to fornication, and going after strange flesh, are set forth for an example, suffering the vengeance of eternal fire." (Jude 6-7).Surely with this above example it is ample to prove that the cities around along with Sodom and Gomorrha where judged and are suffering the "vegeance of eternal fire". Meaning because of their sins, specifically of "fornication" and "strange flesh" (sodomy), they were judged. Time would fail me to quote numerous other biblical examples.death is not separation from God in Hell because paul said do die is gain. death is separation of body from soul, and you choose where you go. "And as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgement." (Hebrews 9:27)."He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; He that overcometh shall not be hurt of the second death." (Revelation 2:11)"He that overcometh, the same shall be clothed in white raiment; and I will not blot out his name out of the book of life, but I will confess his name before my Father, and before his angels." (Revelation 3:5)"And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire." (Revelation 20:14-15).Jesus became sin for us so that we would not die in our sins. And yes people are going to hell without Jesus because their sin is left on them, we must reckon ourself's dead with Christ. Read Romans 5 and 6 for a clear understanding of Christ's death and our salvation.

K
KingJimmy Jul 22, 2005

John 3:18 He who believes in Him is not judged; he who does not believe has been judged already, because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. 19 This is the judgment, that the Light has come into the world, and men loved the darkness rather than the Light, for their deeds were evil. 20 For everyone who does evil hates the Light, and does not come to the Light for fear that his deeds will be exposed.There is a partial truth to what you are saying: men go to hell because they reject Jesus. However, this key pasage of Scripture teaches that the reason men reject Jesus is because they are sinners, who love their sin. Because of such, they reject Christ. Because of such, they go to hell.The wages of sin is death. In the day Adam and Eve ate from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, they died. Literally taking what God said, they should have dropped dead that very moment. However, in that day, when they became partakers of sin, they did die: spritually. That spiritual death manifested itself in physical death. And if you and I die physically in a state of spiritual death, you and I will enter into eternity in that same spiritual state, death, and live in hell forever and ever. This is what the Scriptures consistantly teach. I believe what you have done with your statements is to soften the wrath of God that will be revealed from heaven against all sin, because perhaps to you it sounds too harsh, too unloving, too impersonal, and the like. If you are not careful, you could end up in the land of easy-belivism, which is where this doctrine you teach I believe is born.

L
Logic Jul 22, 2005

TiltedHalo says, "But I have to say that it is because of sin that we are promised the reward of hell. Yes the wages of sin is death, I say, “ you are wrong because the verse clearly says that we are promised the reward of death and not hell.You say, “But you are taking upon a literal definition of "death".I say, “of course, Adam and Eve started to begin to die when they ate that fruit, before they ate they were not dieing at all. But It was also a spiritual death also.You say, “Not accepting this gift, & continuing to live in sin is what demands a debt paid by being completely severed from the communion with God in everlasting purgatory.I say, “You basically just agreed to my first post in this thread here but I don't believe in purgatory.Sermonindex Administrator says, after quoting Jude 6-7, “Surely with this above example it is ample to prove that the cities around along with Sodom and Gomorrah where judged and are suffering the "vengeance of eternal fire". Meaning because of their sins, specifically of "fornication" and "strange flesh" (sodomy), they were judged.”I say, “Since you are using an Old Testament referral we must see how the Old Testament Saints were saved. Gal 3:6 Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness.” The cities around along with Sodom and Gomorrah where not judged because of there sins but because of there unbelief. You say after quoting me," Hebrews 9:27 and as it is appointed unto men once to die, but after this the judgment."I say, “ That word does not mean condemn but in Greek krisis {kree'-sis} to 1) a separating, like at a trial, or contest; 2) selection with an opinion or decision given concerning anything esp. concerning justice and injustice, right or wrong .“ So it is the judging the righteous and the wicked each have there own judgment. The righteous are judged at the Beema seat and the wicked at the White Throne of Judgment.You quoted Revelation 20:14-15, "And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire."I say, “they were cast out because there name was not found written in the book of life and not because of sin. Your name gets written in it when you accept That sacrifice, along with His resurrection and repent from your sins.You Said, “Jesus became sin for us so that we would not die in our sins. And yes people are going to hell without Jesus because their sin is left on them, we must reckon our self’s dead with Christ. Read Romans 5 and 6 for a clear understanding of Christ's death and our salvation.I say, “To die IN our sins we will go to hell not Because of them.KingJimmysays after quoting John 3:18-20,” There is a partial truth to what you are saying: men go to hell because they reject Jesus. However, this key passage of Scripture teaches that the reason men reject Jesus is because they are sinners, who love their sin. Because of such, they reject Christ. Because of such, they go to hell.I say, “the Scripture does not teach that the reason men reject Jesus is because they are sinners It is because the hate the Light and hate the Truth! If what you say is true, then no one would be saved because all are sinners. The wicked are not judged because of sin but because he has not believed in the name of the only begotten Son of God. John 3:18You said, “The wages of sin is death. In the day Adam and Eve ate from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, they died. Literally taking what God said, they should have dropped dead that very moment. However, in that day, when they became partakers of sin, they did die: spiritually. That spiritual death manifested itself in physical death. And if you and I die physically in a state of spiritual death, you and I will enter into eternity in that same spiritual state, death, and live in hell forever and ever.I say, “I completely understand all this, please read my thread “Origin of sin & death” in the Scriptures and Doctrine section.You said, “This is what the Scriptures consistently teach. I believe what you have done with your statements is to soften the wrath of God that will be revealed from heaven against all sin, because perhaps to you it sounds too harsh, too unloving, too impersonal, and the like. If you are not careful, you could end up in the land of easy-belivism, which is where this doctrine you teach I believe is born.I say, “I did not soften the wrath of God that will be revealed from heaven against all sin. Because I still acknowledge that people go to hell, into the fire that never shall be quenched: Where their worm (conscience) dieth not, and the fire is not quenched. I do not think that it is to harsh too unloving, too impersonal, and the like because I accept the reality of it no matter how God puts it, People do go to hell. It is not easy-belivism Because I tell the unsaved They will go to hell if they don’t accepted That sacrifice, along with His resurrection and repent from there sins, I am not once saved always saved which easy-belivism is found. Prove to me how this Doctrine leads in that way.

E
ellie Jul 22, 2005

DID YOU ASK GOD ?When I read your postings, I get this terrible feeling in my spirit.It also seems as if you are re-writing the Bible.It is definitely an Affront to God, the things that you state to us as being 'it'I am quite sure that you do not have God's approval.Did you ask him if all the statements you are making are true? Did you ask him if it was ok to make the statements in public?We have a saying, which is: "He has put the Cat among the Pigeons" do you know what this means?God and Jesus are not a game to be played with. He is watching looking and listening to you. We need to verify with him before..... Well there is a lot I could say but I am not going to.I get the feeling that you are a controversial person.I have said all these things as your posts disturb me and this is my answer to all of them and any further postings. The only purpose I can see is that I myself would suffer from exhaustion answering at length statements that I find distasteful, and a waste of precious time. You might say well you don’t have to answer them that would be correct. The thing is I see the postings question, which also disturbs me, and I looked for this very reason.ellie

L
Logic Jul 22, 2005

.I have said all these things as your posts disturb me and this is my answer to all of them and any further postings. The only purpose I can see is that I myself would suffer from exhaustion answering at length statements that I find distasteful, and a waste of precious time. You might say well you don’t have to answer them that would be correct. The thing is I see the postings question, which also disturbs me, and I looked for this very reason.My only wish here is to chalenge the Saint in looking deeper into the Doctorines of Scripter, and if I am in erore my hope is to be shown the truth. I love to listen to my critics because they have a reason for there statements. But I want my critics to show me why they are saying what they do. it makes for good conversation too.Please read My posts "The Origin of Sin & Death" and "Seeking Jesus, Knowing His will." and see more of my "doctorines" and you will see that I am very conservitive in my views.If anyone can pesuade me to there view I will gladly accept it. But all I read is missunderstandings of what I am saying. When People are right, I agree to them and cannot give a rebuttle, but when I can give a rebuttle it shows that I am explaing there mistake of what I have said

E
ellie Jul 22, 2005

I still feel very much in my spirit that it is cat and mouse.There are many subjects that can be debated.And as I said in the PM Post Message to you the other day. It is God you need to seek on this not getting me "Say", to spend precious time, hours upon hours which are not necessary and I can assure you any time in the day, that I have, is precious time and not to be wasted. God showed me His truth by his Holy Spirit when he Miraculously came into my life in my own home I was not attending any church. He is the one who you should be asking. And also what I wrote on the thread is, Ask for his permission about you belief. This is what we are supposed to do as Christians. None of your statements make sense to me they are alien.You have to give your whole self to him; your whole life and he in return will give you a new life in him. The thought of that used to frighten me; I used to think how do you give your life up, won't it be the end, like oh! no! It will be dull.Oh! how I should have done it sooner, what he gives back is so wonderful. And then there is the refining, which does not end. But can be painful in the beginning. To be truly his and to receive the Holy Spirit we have to not keep, a few bits of our self, to our self. He needs all. I am still handing over self at times. Look to him and listen to him in your heart, spirit, being, mind, etc.And then come back with a wonderful testimony of How God changed your thought patterns and filled you with all truth and awe of him.You seem to be very well educated.And you could Post wonderful debates on Gods Word and TruthGod Loves You…. He see’s your heart and mind ellie

sermonindex Jul 22, 2005

I have said all these things as your posts disturb me and this is my answer to all of them and any further postings. The only purpose I can see is that I myself would suffer from exhaustion answering at length statements that I find distasteful, and a waste of precious time. You might say well you don’t have to answer them that would be correct. The thing is I see the postings question, which also disturbs me, and I looked for this very reason.I agree with sister Ellie, these forums are primarly for the edification of the body. Really its for people who are seeking after truth not defending their belief system and stating facts. These forums are not the best place to debate and look for controversy. But rather a place to come alongside each other and seek the face of Jesus.

T
TiltedHalo Jul 23, 2005

Don't throw your pearls to the pigs, they will just trample all over them. Jesus never argued either Kingdom, He proclaimed & kept it moving. Points were made on both ends, and as Ellie stated, it is viable to debate on mans doctrine, but not the Word of God, that is everlasting & 110% truth. And i pray you find it sir.God Bless

sermonindex Jul 23, 2005

Logic said A person doesn't goes to hell because of sin, He dies because of it, For the wages of sin is death; and if he dies in his sin, then he will go to hell. Jesus died on the cross for all people and therefor all peoples' sins, even the people who will reject His sacrifice. But that is why they go to hell, not because of sin.Perhaps this line of scripture, in which Jesus Himself is speaking, defines sin absolutely such that there is no room for manoeuvre for any of us, as sermonindex said.John 168 And when he is come, he will reprove the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment: 9 Of sin, because they believe not on me;In other words, it is a sin to not believe into Jesus.death is not separation from God in Hell because paul said do die is gain. death is separation of body from soul, and you choose where you go. Brother, everyone is already totally dead in trespasses and sins. The only way to any kind of meaninful life - and yes, the choice is ours - is through faith in Jesus Christ.

M
MrBillPro Jul 23, 2005

Well, we all have to work out our "own" salvation, Surly the blood shed at the cross was not in vain, or Jesus sure died a horrible worthless death, so I personally believe in my salvation that Christ and I are on the same page, he tells me I would like to perfect you Mr. Bill but all have fallen short including you and that is what my blood was shed for so do your best and I will help you work out the rest. You know even though the Bible might be in black and white and some of us including myself try and interpret scripture to fit what they want to believe that is why the most important principle to remember in studying God's Word is that it can only be understood with the help of the Holy Spirit. Those who approach the Bible without the Holy Spirit to teach them, may gain some insight into their lives, but will receive no life-changing revelation. There are cultists and atheists who know the Bible better than many Christians. Why are some able to read of God's Word, and yet bear no fruit in their lives? The answer is simple: Because, they are not open to the Holy Spirit's guidance as they read the Word. Therefore, it is absolutely crucial that we acknowledge the presence of the Holy Spirit and ask Him to lead us into all truth and to make the mysteries of God's Word known to our spirit. Just my two cents. :-?

C
Compton Jul 23, 2005

...a place to come alongside each other and seek the face of Jesus. This is one of the best mission statements I have ever heard. Beautiful.

L
Logic Jul 23, 2005

does anyone read what I am accualy saying? If you did, you would not disagree. It is basic theology that I post, with no debat needed. I just want people to see the scriptures more clearly by being specific and using specific terms for a more accurate interprataion. I am only saying two words that you all are missing. die in your sins you go to hell not because of your sins. The word "Because" denots a reason for whatever. if the reason you are in hell or if it was because of your sins, the cross of Christ is no effect because you still sin, and because of sin you are saying you go to hell. All I am saying is that Jesus takes the condemnation of that sin off of us so we are no longer in sin. 1Corinth. 15:17 And if Christ be not raised, your faith [is] vain; ye are yet in your sins.Psalm 51:5 Behold, I was shapen in iniquity; and in sin did my mother conceive me.Romans 8:2 For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the law of sin and death. You are eather in the law of sin and death or in Christ Jesus.What I write is not off base.It is like when someone says Jesus died on the cross for us. He didn't. He died on the cross because of us for His Father. Saying that he died for us is man centered. The other way is Christ centered. We must get away from the man centered religion!When ever you all try to show me I am wrong, you are only showing me that you misunderstand what I have written and when I respond to your replies I am only explaining your error in your response to what I have said. I love the Truth, if I am wrong, my mouth will be stopped by your rebuttle.

M
MrBillPro Jul 23, 2005

Logic wrote:It is basic theology that I post, with no debat needed. basic theology? I did not know there was such a thing as basic theology, all of it seems so alive and in depth to me, I will only really understand it when I meet the person who inspired it,then and only then will there be no more debates. :-)

C
Compton Jul 24, 2005

Logic,I can recognize that you are trying to make a point...but your recent threads tend to come off like argumentative challenges. Unlike many forums, this place tends to work better when we invest time listening, rather then immediately provoking one other. If all we do is post manifestos then communication and fellowship breaks down. There are pilgrims here who have long been walking the rugged road that basic theology can only describe...I have been humbled by them. I continue to be appreciative of the caliber of descipleship in this forum. Before starting any new threads, why not take some time to interact in some of their conversations? As for this thread, let me offer this bit of understanding...Lewis Sperry Chafer, who founded the Dallas Theological Seminary, had commentary that was along similar lines to your thesis. (My memory may not render this exactly as he put it...)"People need not go to hell because of sin but because they have rejected the solution for sin in Christ." His premise wasn't designed to shock or to put forth an antinomian gospel, but to underline the fact that God was, through Christ, propitious towards all men...not just saints. He was trying to recognize the completion of the work Christ did on behalf of the world whether man enters into or not. "And He is the propitiation for our sins; not for our's only, but also for the sins of the whole world."1 John 2:2 He was not saying that sin has not made the sinner the object of everlasting wrath. Chafer, (whose theology was decended from the likes of the Plymouth Brethren and Jonathan Edwards), believed God was just in reserving utter wrath for man because of sin. His statement was meant to underscore the double tragedy of men going to hell for sins that Jesus died for. Yes, all men are condemned by God for their sin, but now there is a reconciliation possible through Christ who has borne all sin which renders God propitious. If there was any shock value in his premise, it was to challenge the wrong notion that our sorrowful repentence over sin is the work that softens God's heart towards us. On the contrary it is revealed, "Behold the lamb of God that takes away the sins of the World." Asking God to see our sorrow over sin as good behavior that merits mercy is "rank unbelief" in the work of Jesus Christ. True repentance is a work born of true faith in God's satisfacton with His son. With this Godward understanding firmly in place, not believing does indeed become the ultimate reason for condemnation. MC

L
Logic Jul 24, 2005

I can recognize that you are trying to make a point...but your recent threads tend to come off like argumentative challenges. I am sorry for that, I tend to bluntly state facts and not to put things in a more social syntax.this place tends to work better when we invest time listening, rather then immediately provoking one other. My intention is only to provoke one to search the Scritures more deeply and to see the truth from our doctorine in a more difined view.As for this thread, let me offer this bit of understanding...I thank you for your understanding, I am glad to see that you can realate to where I am comming from.His premise wasn't designed to shock or to put forth an antinomian gospel, but to underline the fact that God was, through Christ, propitious towards all men...not just saints. He was trying to recognize the completion of the work Christ did on behalf of the world whether man enters into or not.It was neather my premise, but that is the way people took it and it verily frusterated me. I didn't know how to be any more clear on what I was trying to say, and that is maybe why I sounded the way I did.Yes, all men are condemned by God for their sin, but now there is a reconciliation possible through Christ who has borne all sin which renders God propitious. My main point is all men are only condemned by God for their rejection of Christ and in the old testement They were only condemned by God for their unbelief Gal 3:6 Even as Abraham believed God, and it was accounted to him for righteousness. Job 19:25 For I know [that] my redeemer liveth, and [that] he shall stand at the latter [day] upon the earth: and also for the non-jews Jonah 3:5 So the people of Nineveh believed God, and proclaimed a fast, and put on sackcloth, from the greatest of them even to the least of them. If there was any shock value in his premise, it was to challenge the wrong notion that our sorrowful repentence over sin is the work that softens God's heart towards us. Same thing goes for my topic but as I said My intention is only to provoke one to search the Scritures more deeply and to see the truth from our doctorine in a more difined view.again I thank you for your understanding.

E
ellie Jul 24, 2005

Logic...Quote: My intention is only e:to provoke one to search the Scritures more deeply and to see the truth from our doctorinein a more difined view.You say "our Doctrine" which is, what, who, where, when.Who are you, what church do you attend.ellie

L
Logic Jul 24, 2005

You say "our Doctrine" which is, what, who, where, when.Who are you, what church do you attend.Our Doctrine as in the Doctrine of the Church of our lord witch all true Christians attend.I am a conservative Christian that studies apologetics. My Church is Non-denominational with Pastor Bill Randles. Try Googling his name once. and go to the websight. http://www.believersingrace.com/ We believe the Bible, both old and new testaments, is the Word of God, it is infallible and inspired and to submit to Jesus as Lord is to submit to the absolute authority of the Bible. We believe in one eternal God, infinite and personal,--our Creator as well as our Redeemer, the Almighty, the Father. God has revealed Himself unto us as three eternal persons, the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit. We believe that Jesus Christ is our Creator, God, manifested for us in the flesh, born of a virgin--truly man, truly God, but unmixed, crucified as a sacrifice for our sins and after totally satisfying the just judgement of God against us as sinners, He was raised from the dead, bodily, ascended to heaven and is seated at the right hand of God, as the only true and living way to God. We believe in the fall of man as recorded in Genesis 3, that though man is created in the image of God, and to this day he bears that image, the fall has resulted in absolute sinfulness and total depravity of man. We believe that there is none righteous, no not one, there is none that doeth good, none that seeks God. Man can only be saved by justifying God, believing and acknowledging the truth of the Gospel of Jesus Christ and repenting, allowing God to justify us freely by grace. We believe that water baptism is the true confession of repentance of dead works, and resurrection with and in union to Jesus, and it is the appeal to God for a good conscience, and salvation from this age. But you need not to be baptised in order to go to heaven as the theif on the cross was never baptised We believe God has called us to a holy life by the power of the Spirit and the means of grace, prayer, the Word, fellowship, and worship. We believe that we receive power when the Holy Spirit comes upon us in the baptism of the Spirit--power to witness and have supernatural gifts to edify one another and the lost. We believe in the communion elements and what they represent, the Body of Christ broken for our healing and reunity--the Blood of Jesus shed for the remission of our sins and the communion to renew our fellowship in Him. We believe in the soon coming of our Lord Jesus, and our gathering together unto Him, the end of this age, the resurrection of all, saved and lost, the saved shall receive reward and the lost shall be expelled to receive eternal punishment.

This discussion is locked.

Archived
1 of 39 posts