BSBKJVWEBYLTASVBBEWMBT4TDBY|HymnsMusicDonate
Menu
Theology

What is Chiliasm?

A
ArthurRosh Jan 17, 2024

What is Chiliasm?

Also known as Millennialism, Premillennialism, Millenarianism

The doctrine of the advent of a sensual millennial kingdom of Christ on earth (in Jerusalem).

The beginning of chiliasm dates back to pre-Christian times. Most Jews saw in the promised Messiah not a Redeemer from sin, damnation and death, but an earthly king who would create his kingdom on earth and give power and authority to the Jewish people.

Jews who converted to Christianity brought such views into the Church.

The father and the first propagator of the sensual millennium is the heretic of the apostolic age Cerinthus.

He taught that when Christ sets up his 1000-year kingdom on earth, he will restore Jerusalem to its former splendor and majesty and will again introduce the fulfillment of all the prescriptions and regulations of the ritual law of Moses, with all the Old Testament sacrifices; the happiness and bliss of the righteous will then consist of all kinds of sensual pleasure.

Augustine refuted the millenarian idea that after 6,000 years there would be an earthly millennium. Instead, he argued, the Seventh Age began with the Incarnation.

Augustine believed that the millennium was not a future event but already in progress, already set in motion by Christ. Augustine used the notion of the Two Cities. There was a heavenly city, the celestial Jerusalem, where the millennium was already manifest, and a terrestrial Babylon, the time-bound city of violence and oppression in which the millennium was not visible. These two cities would coexist as a corpus permixtum (a mixed body) in every saint and in every church until the Eschaton.

Dionysius of Alexandria refuted the Chiliastic doctrine against which Origen had dealt so heavy blows (belief in a literal 1000-year reign of Christ on earth). Dionysius succeeded in expelling Chiliasm from the Church.

Chiliasm was condemned at the Council of Nicea. The Church, having condemned the heretic Apollinaris of Laodicea, also condemned his teaching about the millennial kingdom. For this purpose, the phrase, "whose kingdom will have no end” were added to the Nicene Creed.

The Church understands the millennial kingdom as an indefinite period of time from the beginning of the grace-filled kingdom of the Church to the end of the world.

The first resurrection means the spiritual rebirth of people into eternal life in Christ in baptism which is sometimes called resurrection (Colossians 3, Ephesians 2).

The temporary release of the devil from prison for a short time means the appearance on earth of the antichrist shortly before the end of the world, which will be followed by the universal and final judgment.

The second death is the condemnation of sinners at the universal judgment, which will not affect those who have participation in the first resurrection, that is, spiritually regenerated in Christ and purified by His grace.

Eusebius rejected Papias' claims with almost contempt. It is assumed that he assimilated these ideas, he said, due to a misunderstanding of the apostolic writings, not realizing to himself that the things they spoke about were expressed in mystical images (Church History 3.38).

One of the things that gave rise to mistrust for the millennium was the fact that, without a doubt, it leaned towards a materialistic interpretation, which offered physical pleasure on a par with spiritual pleasure. Eusebius tells how Dionysius of Alexandria had to deal with a very respected bishop named Nepos, who taught and talked about a thousand-year period of bodily luxury on this earth (Church History 7.24). The heretic Cerinthus deliberately spoke of the millennial gluttony, overeating, drunkenness (Church History 3.28).

Jerome spoke almost with contempt of those who are waiting for a Jerusalem with overflowing gold and precious stones from heaven.

Origen reprimanded those who awaited bodily pleasures in a millennium. The saints will indeed eat, but it will be the bread of life, they will drink, but it will be a cup of wisdom (On First Principles).

Augustine, on the other hand, we might say, dealt an almost fatal blow to the doctrine of the millennium. At one time he himself was a supporter of this doctrine of the millennium, however he learned to see in the captivity of Satan the binding of the strong man as predicted by the Lord.

Matthew 12:29
How can one enter a strong man’s house and plunder his goods, unless he first binds the strong man? And then he will plunder his house.

Mark 3:27
No one can enter a strong man’s house and plunder his goods, unless he first binds the strong man. Then indeed he may plunder his house.

Luke 11:21”­-”¬22
When the strong man, fully armed, guards his own house, his goods are safe, but when a stronger man than he attacks and conquers him, he takes away his armor on which he relied, and distributes his plunder.

Ephesians 4:7-10
To each one of us grace has been given as Christ distributed it. Therefore it says, When He ascended on high, He led a host of captives (plunder), and distributed gifts to men.

Psalm 68:18
You ascended on high, leading a host of captives and receiving (NT: distributing) gifts among men, even among the rebellious, that the LORD God may live among them.

In a thousand years - the entire period between the First Advent and the last battle.

In the first resurrection - spiritual participation in the resurrection of Christ, which belongs to all the baptized. (Augustine, On the City of God).

Chiliasm has never been an accepted teaching of the Church.

sermonindex Jan 17, 2024

Chiliasm was condemned at the Council of Nicea.

The term "chiliasm" is not charitable and was created by older church councils to condemn brethren with an "anathema".

The view of a 1000-year reign of Christ was what most if not all early church believers subscribed to.

As the Church grew in control over people with its system, it changed that opinion.

The council 700 years later was from a Church that was mostly apostate, had mary worship and lots of other grievous errors.

E
ESchaible Jan 17, 2024

Amen Brother Greg.

In addition, that article is a massive straw man - it misrepresents, I think, every view it claims to refute.

C
ccchhhrrriiisss Jan 17, 2024

Hi ArthurRosh,

Chiliasm has never been an accepted teaching of the Church.

While I don't use terms like "Chiliasm" to label what you've defined, I agree with Greg (i.e., SermonIndex). It is simply incorrect to assert that a "millennial kingdom of Christ on earth (in Jerusalem)" has never been "an accepted teaching of the Church.

I have heard, studied and come to understand the argument behind amillennialism. However, I simply do not believe that the Scriptures (as a whole) support such a position. In fact, I'm quite highly convinced quite the opposite to be true.

If one reads through the Word of God in a cover-to-cover manner, it becomes very clear that the "Promised Land" plays an important part of the text. Not only is this land promised to Abraham and his descendants (which I would argue includes believing Gentiles who were grafted into the vine), but Moses repeatedly spoke prophetically concerning Jerusalem (i.e., "the place that the Lord your God will choose to put his name there").

Again: If you go through the Old Testament, you see the Promised Land as central to the entire Biblical narrative.

GENESIS:
The promise given of a Promised Land
EXODUS through DEUTERONOMY:
The journey to the Promised Land
JOSHUA:
Entering and settling the Promised Land
JUDGES through I SAMUEL:
Interactions with peoples within the Promised Land
I SAMUEL through 2 KINGS/2 CHRONICLES:
Life under kings within the Promised Land
2 KINGS, 2 CHRONICLES:
Idolatry/unbelief leads to captivity away from the Promised Land
EZRA and NEHEMIAH:
Remnant returns from captivity to rebuild the Promised Land
PROPHETS:
Prophecy regarding coming Messiah. Some of it is about the Messiah's physical life on Earth and with much of it regarding his future rule from "Jerusalem" in the Promised Land.

The Jews were (and many still are) waiting for a Messiah to come. However, they perceive only the prophetic passages concerning a conquering Messiah who would rule and reign from Jerusalem. Most misinterpret (or ignore) passages regarding Jesus -- the Messiah who first came as a humble Passover lamb to be slain. They primarily perceive the passages of the conquering king who would restore the kingdom of Israel rather than a divine king who would become an atoning sacrifice for the world.

Yet, after the King of the Jews, Jesus, died and rose again and was about to ascend, his own disciples asked about the restoration of the kingdom to Israel:

.......
.......

"Lord, will you at this time restore the kingdom to Israel?”

Acts 1:6 (ESV)

.......
.......

What was the Lord's response? He didn't correct them. He didn't tell them that they had misinterpreted Scripture. He didn't tell them that he would NOT restore to or reign from a kingdom of Israel. Rather, he said:

.......
.......

"It is not for you to know times or seasons that the Father has fixed by his own authority."

Acts 1:7 (ESV)

.......
.......

Jesus said that it wasn't for us to know the times and seasons that the Father HAS FIXED by his own authority. In other words, the times and seasons were "fixed" (or, in Greek, "tithēmi" meaning "appointed," "established," "set" or "laid down") by the Father.

It's possible to consider two things here:
1.) It's not for us (Christ's disciples) to know the times and the seasons for this; and,
2.) The Father HAS set the times and seasons for this (i.e, the restoration of the kingdom to Israel [verse 6]) to be accomplished.

If you read the "faith" chapter (Hebrews 11), you read of individuals who sought -- but did not receive -- the promises. We read of Abraham who only dwelt in tents in the promised land because he was looking "to the city that has foundations, whose designer and builder is God" (Hebrews 11:10). We read of Joseph in Egypt making plans so that his bones could be returned to the Promised Land (Hebrews 11:22).

Now, that city that Abraham was looking for is, indeed, a HEAVENLY city. However, as Revelation explains, it's a city that "comes down OUT OF HEAVEN" (Revelation 3:12, 21:2, 21:10). This brings more clarity via Hebrews 12, the chapter subsequent to the "faith" chapter.

.......
.......

18 For you have not come to what may be touched, a blazing fire and darkness and gloom and a tempest 19 and the sound of a trumpet and a voice whose words made the hearers beg that no further messages be spoken to them.

20 For they could not endure the order that was given, "If even a beast touches the mountain, it shall be stoned.” 21 Indeed, so terrifying was the sight that Moses said, "I tremble with fear.”

22 But you have come to Mount Zion and to the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to innumerable angels in festal gathering, 23 and to the assembly of the firstborn who are enrolled in heaven, and to God, the judge of all, and to the spirits of the righteous made perfect, 24 and to Jesus, the mediator of a new covenant, and to the sprinkled blood that speaks a better word than the blood of Abel.

25 See that you do not refuse him who is speaking. For if they did not escape when they refused him who warned them on earth, much less will we escape if we reject him who warns from heaven.

26 At that time his voice shook the earth, but now he has promised, "Yet once more I will shake not only the earth but also the heavens.”

27 This phrase, "Yet once more,” indicates the removal of things that are shaken -- that is, things that have been made -- in order that the things that cannot be shaken may remain.

28 Therefore let us be grateful for receiving a kingdom that cannot be shaken, and thus let us offer to God acceptable worship, with reverence and awe, 29 for our God is a consuming fire.

.......
.......

Thus, the reign of Christ Jesus from a new city -- a "new Jerusalem" -- that comes down from heaven is indisputable. It replaces the old city yet still within the land that was promised.

As for the millennium itself: Revelation chapter 20 is fairly specific about it -- repeating this period of "a thousand years" a total of seven times. In terms of Revelation's timeline, that millennium period takes place before the new Jerusalem comes down from heaven. This leads me to believe that this thousand-year period is within the confines of physical space-time.

D
docs Jan 18, 2024

Even a shallow investigation into the fancifully named subject of "chialism" will show that the widely accepted notion that chialism was never an accepted doctrine of the church is false. It's not a case of being overbearing in one's belief to say that, it's just the facts mam as they say. It was the Hebrew prophets themselves, major and minor, who began the theme of a literal physical kingdom of God ruling on earth and not just far away in an etheral, heavenly realm devoid of any earthly aspects. The fact that God chose one nation to be the center of this coming earthly kingdom need not be a stumbling block at all. It's just simply God's all wise, pre-determinned electing choice and has blessings of manifold volumes in store for the entire world and Gentile believers and nations.

Quoting,

THE NEW COVENANTALISM OF THE PROPHETS

The prophets not only sketched the essential features of the new covenant era, they also revealed important aspects of the manner in which it would come about. While they didn’t realize the twofold coming of the Priest-King to deliver Israel and the world, they do provide the roadmap of what’s ahead. This is critical to note because it was here that other versions of the Bible story begin imputing to the NT authors notions of "re-interpreting,” clever "new twists,” "re-defining,” and "new visions” to subsume the prophetic vision of Israel into the NT Church. Such invention is indeed needless if we attend to how the prophets themselves understood the manner the story should unfold. Four dimensions of the prophets’ new covenantalism are particularly important to set the stage for the subsequently for the Land and the People of Israel. Hewre is the first of the four.

People and Land

"In the view of the prophets there would be a literal, physical regathering of the Jews under a new movement of the Holy Spirit. The process ends in Israel’s spiritual as well as physical, restoration to their Land in a kingdom-state like other kingdoms and nations (Dan. 2:44; Isa. 49:6). In revisionist readings, Israel is replaced by a "New Israel” (Church), exile ends in Christ who is the "new Moses and himself "Israel,” and God gets the glory in the typological "restoration” of some other "Israel.” So also the Land promises are fulfilled by the Gospel outreach that is going on throughout the whole world.

(From "The People. The Land, And The Future Of Israel” ”“ copyright 2014; Chapter 10 ”“ "Israel As A Necessary Theme In Biblical Theology” ”“ Dr. Mark R. Saucy; pg 175-176)

Over tppological, re-interpretive replacemnent theology has done much to mar the true meanings of many of the prophets regrarding the eventual destiny of Israel and casts much misunderstanding on present events in the world involving Israel. Thank the Lord that, in His goodness, a new current stream of re-examining the prophets in regard to Israel is beginning to occur.


This discussion is locked.

Archived
1 of 5 posts