BSBKJVWEBYLTASVBBEWMBT4TDBY|HymnsMusicDonate
Menu
Theology

Sanctification - Sinless Perfection or Being Set Apart?

A
AbideinHim Jan 30, 2024

Excerpt from Lewis Sperry Chafer on Sanctification:

THE MEANING OF THE WORDS

1. Sanctify, With Its Various Forms.

This word, which is used one hundred and six times in the Old Testament and thirty-one times in the New Testament, means to "set apart," or the state of being set apart. It indicates classification in matters of position and relationship. The basis of the classification is usually that the sanctified person or thing has been set apart, or separated from others in position and relationship before God from that which is unholy. This is the general meaning of the word.

2. Holy, With Its Various Forms.

This word, which is used about four hundred times in the Old Testament and about twelve times, of believers, in the New Testament, refers to the state of being set apart, or being separate, from that which is unholy. Christ was "holy, harmless, undefiled, and separate from sinners." Thus was He sanctified. So, also, there are certain things which the words holy and sanctify, in their Biblical use, do not imply:

(a) Sinless perfection is not necessarily implied, for we read of a "holy nation," "holy priests," "holy prophets," "holy apostles," "holy men," "holy women," "holy brethren," "holy mountain," and "holy temple." None of these were sinless before God. They were holy according to some particular standard or issue that constituted the basis of their separation from others. Even the Corinthian Christians who were "utterly at fault" were said to be sanctified. Many inanimate things were sanctified, and these could not even be related to the question of sin.

(b) The word does not necessarily imply finality. All these people just named were repeatedly called to higher degrees of holiness. They were set apart again and again. People, or things, became holy as they were set apart for some holy purpose. Thus they were sanctified.

E
ESchaible Jan 30, 2024

"Christ was "holy, harmless, undefiled, and separate from sinners." Thus was He sanctified."

That's the only line in the post that means anything - because the rest misses the whole point, as practically everyone in the forum has regarding this entire topic.

It's a grief to the Father when Jesus is ignored for a self centered examination of what doesn't even exist apart from Him. Jesus doesn't give sanctification, sinlessness, or anything else - He IS those things. Jesus is all.

I think repentance is in order for everyone involved in this entire discussion over the last few days - in every thread it's been brought up in.

A
AbideinHim Jan 30, 2024

Evan, the point is that Jesus was sinless, but we are not, and anyone that thinks they are beyond the point of ever sinning again is deceived. The apostle Paul called himself, "the chief of sinners.” There have been many, godly men that have gone to their deathbed and cried out for mercy. "Lord, forgive me for my sins.”
It is the Lord that keeps us from sin. It is looking at the Jesus, the author, and the finisher of our faith who is the source of our righteousness and sanctification. If we look to ourselves, we will either be in a state of condemnation or self-righteousness.

Most of us have been delivered from the grossest sins of the flesh, but every time you read the sermon on the mount, you’re immediately convicted because we know that the motives of our hearts are not always pure.

E
ESchaible Jan 30, 2024

Mike said"
"who is the source of our righteousness and sanctification"

You see, that's the whole problem - He isn't the source, He IS our righteousness and sanctification.

It's a fundamental and crucial change in viewpoint, and without that change in viewpoint God will never receive glory.

B
brendaM Jan 30, 2024

Christ, living His life through me is my righteousness and sanctification. So where am I wrong as you say 'everyone here'?

T
TMK Jan 30, 2024

ES-

Why not state exactly what you mean?

T
TMK Jan 30, 2024

//Christ, living His life through me is my righteousness and sanctification.//

You seem to be suggesting that since the above is the case, either you can’t and don’t sin or that your sins really aren’t sins because Jesus can’t sin.

If the former, you are sinning because you are lying. If the latter, it’s make believe.

E
ESchaible Jan 30, 2024

You see how quickly these threads turn into disgusting mockeries of everything Jesus died to set man free from?

Honestly, this entire forum, myself included, should be ashamed of itself.


A
AbideinHim Jan 30, 2024


"You see, that's the whole problem - He isn't the source, He IS our righteousness and sanctification."

Evan, I am so blessed that we can agree on something at least!

A
AbideinHim Jan 30, 2024


"You see, that's the whole problem - He isn't the source, He IS our righteousness and sanctification."

Evan, I am so blessed that we can agree on something at least!

A
AbideinHim Jan 30, 2024


"You see, that's the whole problem - He isn't the source, He IS our righteousness and sanctification."

Evan, I am so blessed that we can agree on something at least!

E
ESchaible Jan 30, 2024

Yeah Mike, because after reading through the threads for the last few days in this horrendous excuse for a Christian forum... You and I agreeing on something is the actual issue (Ironically, the quote I disagreed with was verbatim from one of your posts, so no actually, we don't agree).

You have all been rejoicing to see sin in one another's lives, seeking to find it, in the hopes that you can all use it to prove a doctrine wrong.

Honestly, woe to you if you rejoice to see your brethren stumble.

If I was able to and still remain in obedience, I would be once again leaving this forum - as I did back in 2006.

T
TMK Jan 30, 2024

Man no one can answer a simple question. That is always suspect.

E
ESchaible Jan 30, 2024

Todd,

Something that needs to be said, particularly to you:

"The natural person does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for they are folly to him, and he is not able to understand them because they are spiritually discerned.” (1 Corinthians 2:14)

The answer is Jesus is my sanctification, that's what I mean.

and

"Jesus answered him, "Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again he cannot see the kingdom of God.”” (John 3:3)

I beg you Todd, please take this verse to the Lord in prayer - don't not do it out of pride or some desire to be correct - seek the Lord with this as your topic, you will find Him.


A
AbideinHim Jan 30, 2024

Duplicate

A
AbideinHim Jan 30, 2024

A true Christian doesn’t practice habitual sin but it isn’t sinless perfection.
This short video by Paul Washer is the balance of truth between habitual sin and sinless perfection.


https://youtu.be/I_RZ_pcM3YM?si=1gfZHiN9klKk2DcR

B
brendaM Jan 30, 2024

If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us. 1John 1:8.


As we know, good exegesis consists of using the inductive method, in taking many scriptures, and deriving a general conclusion from them. ‘The number, clarity and relevance of those many passages is crucial to the theological conclusions drawn. Building a doctrine on only one or two verses or passages which are unclear or not directly related to the issue, compromises the conclusion.’ (Olson: Beyond Calvinism and Arminianism, Introduction p4).

In the same letter we read:

He that commiteth sin is of the devil. 1 John 3:8.

Whosoever abideth in Him sinneth not, whosoever sinneth hath not seen Him neither known Him John 3:6

Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin 1 John 3:9

He that abideth in Him ought himself also to walk, as even as He walked 1 John 2:6

He that saith I know Him and keepeth not His commandments, is a liar and the truth is not in him. 1John 2:4

Little children, let no man deceive you, he that doeth righteousness is righteous, even as He is righteous. 1 John 3:7

My little children, these things I write to you that you sin not. 1 John 2:1


John’s first letter was written to counteract the heresy which was affecting the church and was a treatise for Christians in general as there is no mention of a specific church as was contended by Lampe in his appeal to Theodoret.

The apostle is declaring to the whole world, his disapprobation of the doctrines maintained by the early or proto Gnostics who taught that Jesus was by birth a mere man but that 'the Christ' descended on Him at His baptism.’ These Gnostics, who taught that man could be righteous in spirit and still sin in the flesh, contended that the apostles had added commandments not given by Christ concerning the doctrine of sanctification. John devotes the greatest part of his epistle to the confirmation and enforcement of his doctrine.

We see that John is describing a process whereby we can test ourselves to see if we are in the true Light whereby the blood of Jesus cleanses us from all sin, and pointing out where the early Gnostic idea has been creeping in:

1:7 if we say we have no sin (as in Gnosticism, my insert) we deceive ourselves 1:8 but if we confess our sin, He will cleanse us from all unrighteousness. Here John shows where the deceivers depart from the truth. Their teaching was that they had no need of this cleansing, as they did not consider immoral actions as sin due to matter being evil which was escaped through having ‘special’ knowledge and not in keeping God’s law. They maintained that a child of God could still sin and continue to have fellowship with God, a concept which was known as ‘spirit salvation’.

The early fathers on the other hand, taught that we must at least be on the road to theosis or union with Christ and this starts with Purification, or knowledge of the sin within, with the desire that we will be cleansed from all sin not that it might remain within. We can see that John is comparing walking in the light to walking in darkness that is, walking in the flesh compared to walking in the Spirit. He is describing two different opposing state which corresponds perfectly with the teaching of the Apostle Paul when he talks about the 'carnal' or fleshy, against those who were walking in the Spirit.


In verses 7 and 9, John says that the benefit of walking in the light are:-

1)We have fellowship with one another in the unity of the Spirit (agreement)
2)By confessing our sins we will be forgiven
3)We will then be cleansed by the blood of Jesus from all unrighteousness and sin.

Whereas if we walk in the flesh:-

1)We are deceived and remain in our sin
2)There is no truth in us
3)We make God a liar by denying our need for cleansing from all sin.

So John is saying that it is only when we are walking in the darkness that we are blind to our need of coming to Christ for His cleansing from all sin. The letter is to believers and not unbelievers. And believers can fall into the error of walking in the flesh as Paul demonstrated to the Galatians who thought that they could go on to maturity or perfection through the works of the law and not through faith.

Those who were being misled by the Gnosticism and today by the preachers of 'positional righteousness' were walking in darkness because they were still sinning and did not see their need of the cleansing which can be provided by Christ alone. So they thought that they had no sin to be dealt with and were acceptable as they were to be in fellowship with Christ, but John says that they walk in darkness. But if we see our need for cleansing from all sin and come to Christ then He will be able to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. So it is these ones who are saying wrongly that they have no sin not the ones who have come to Christ and have been cleansed from all unrighteousness and are in union with Christ, or in the state of theosis. Brenda Redshaw 2022

E
ESchaible Jan 30, 2024

I haven't watched the Paul Washer video, but if I was a wagering man, I would wager to say he said something about Jesus being the sole and all consuming goal of our lives.

Ironic how that can be mentioned, even in this thread, and sin and self still comes right back around and eclipses Him, as if sanctification was sinlessness in the first place.

Like I said, ALL in this forum need repentance.


T
TMK Jan 30, 2024

I’m confronting folks who say they no longer sin and therefore I am not born again.

Makes perfect sense!

M
murrcolr Jan 30, 2024

Are we to continue in sin that grace may abound?

By no means!

How can we who died to sin still live in it?

Do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death?

We were buried therefore with him by baptism into death, in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, we too might walk in newness of life.

For if we have been united with him in a death like his, we shall certainly be united with him in a resurrection like his.

We know that our old self was crucified with him in order that the body of sin might be brought to nothing, so that we would no longer be enslaved to sin.

For one who has died has been set free from sin.

Now if we have died with Christ, we believe that we will also live with him.

We know that Christ, being raised from the dead, will never die again; death no longer has dominion over him. For the death he died he died to sin, once for all, but the life he lives he lives to God. So you also must consider yourselves dead to sin and alive to God in Christ Jesus.

Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal body, to make you obey its passions.

Do not present your members to sin as instruments for unrighteousness, but present yourselves to God as those who have been brought from death to life, and your members to God as instruments for righteousness.

For sin will have no dominion over you, since you are not under law but under grace.

Slaves to Righteousness

What then?

Are we to sin because we are not under law but under grace?

By no means!

Do you not know that if you present yourselves to anyone as obedient slaves,you are slaves of the one whom you obey, either of sin, which leads to death, or of obedience, which leads to righteousness?

But thanks be to God, that you who were once slaves of sin have become obedient from the heart to the standard of teaching to which you were committed, and, having been set free from sin, have become slaves of righteousness.

I am speaking in human terms, because of your natural limitations. For just as you once presented your members as slaves to impurity and to lawlessness leading to more lawlessness, so now present your members as slaves to righteousness leading to sanctification.

For when you were slaves of sin, you were free in regard to righteousness. But what fruit were you getting at that time from the things of which you are now ashamed?

For the end of those things is death.

But now that you have been set free from sin and have become slaves of God, the fruit you get leads to sanctification and its end, eternal life.

For the wages of sin is death, but the free gift of God is eternal life in Christ Jesus our Lord.

This discussion is locked.

Archived
1 of 29 posts