BSBKJVWEBYLTASVBBEWMBT4TDBY|HymnsMusicDonate
Menu
General

Obese Christians?

C
Christisking Aug 7, 2005

First of all I want to set a few things straight. By obese I mean someone who is 30 pounds plus over weight (the medical definition), not some one who has a few pounds to lose. I myself could stand to lose a few more pounds and I have a large frame body type. I am 6’ 2” 255, I work out 4 days a week, watch what I eat, fast at least once a week, and ride a bike 20 to 40 mile a week. If I were to stop doing this I would be over 300 pounds in no time flat. That is just the type of body the Lord gave me. I am not one of those people who can eat anything, never exercise and never gain a pound. With that being said - I would like to pose the following questions:Isn’t it a sin to be obese? We know the heath problems of obesity are staggering. A literal health epidemic in America. I have even heard it said that being obese is more harmful to your health than smoking. I can’t imagine that harming our bodies in such a way would be anything but sin in the eyes of God. Aren’t our bodies to be offered as a sacrifice holy and acceptable to God? Aren’t our bodies the temple of the Holy Ghost? Won’t we stand naked before God on the day of judgment?Yet I go to numerous different churches and see obese people worshiping and dancing as if they are doing nothing wrong and not living a continual lifestyle of sin. As many as 3 out of every 10 people fit this category. (30+ pounds over weight) How can this be? Are pastors too cowardly to confront the obese members of their congregation with their lifestyle of sin. Would pastors allow openly homosexuals to worship and dance week after week along with the rest of their congregation and pretend they are Christian while they live a continual lifestyle of sin? Then why are pastors allowing obese people to dance and worship dance week after week along with the rest of their congregation and pretend they are Christian while they live a continual lifestyle of sin? Can anyone give me a link to a sermon where the speaker has firmly denounced obesity and calls it sin? :-o I honestly don't mean to offend any one, but I feel it is a legitamate question. And I feel calling sin - sin is more important then the chance we may offend.

sermonindex Aug 7, 2005

Well, I'm not over-weight, to put it more kindly, but I'd rather have a bunch of fat "Loving" folks in my Church, then well, how would ya say it ... I guess, it's a question of casting the first stone or something.Ha, I'm sorry for that answer ... I'm sure you didn't need to hear from the peanut-head-gallery today. :-?Maybe I'm just in my silly-mode again. (no doubt)Hope someone can give you a better answer.Love to you.Annie

M
moreofHim Aug 7, 2005

Hi Patrick,Yes, we have actually discussed this a few times on SI before. I think it was not long ago that Dann posted a wonderful post about gluttony, the overlooked sin- about his own weight loss and how he has been riding his bike also.this is the thread, hope it's not backwards :)Gluttony- the overlooked SinAs a former personal fitness trainer, but also a person in bondage to eating disorders, it is a subject that is near to my heart. All things should be done for the glory of God and we should have self control in all areas as well. Self control is a fruit of the spirit.When i went through a program called the Lord's Table, we learned that the reason we wanted to get our eating on track, was not because of our looks or for our happiness, but to please God, to bring him glory in our lives.For some, food is an addiction, a source of comfort, a form of denial. Food can be an idol. Just like anything else can be an idol.This is not to say that gluttony is any worse or better than other sins.Well, I could go on and on about this, so I'll just stop here. :)But i will leave you these verses:Look, this was the iniquity of your sister Sodom: She and her daughter had pride, fullness of food, and abundance of idleness...Ezekiel 16:49for the kingdom of God is not eating and drinking,but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit.Romans 14:17For the drunkard and the glutton will come to poverty,and drowsiness will clothe a man with rags.Proverbs 23:21But I discipline my body and bring it into subjection, lest when I preach to others, I myself should become disqualified.1 Corinthians 9:27...do not worry about your life, what you will eat or what you will drink; nor about your body. Is not life more important than food and the body more than clothing?Matthew 6:25Hope this helped to answer some of your questions :)In Him, Chanin

C
ccchhhrrriiisss Aug 7, 2005

Hi Christisking...!Perhaps you should make a distinction between obesity and gluttony. It is not a sin to be obese. There are people that I know who eat far less than I do, yet are plagued with obesity. Often, this has less to do with how much they eat, as with what they eat. Such a lifestyle can be a terrible price to pay for later in life. I am thin (but somewhat athletic), yet I often feel convicted because of the foods that I eat. The Bible is clear that our bodies are the Temple of the Holy Spirit. Thus, we should not take things into our body that might be harmful to us. But who is to judge what those things might be? A half of a twinkie might be worse than a large bag of potato chips. And remember, each person reacts differently to particular foods. My mother's nutritionist urges her to stay away from many green vegetables (containing Vitamin K) because of excess clotting agents in her blood. On the other hand, most people are urged to eat their vegetables.The important thing is that we should urge one another to take care of the "temple" that God has given us. We should not be lazy. We should always eat in moderation. And we should always be aware of what things we are placing in our body. But we should not be judgmental of those who are "obese." Calling someone that is obese "sinful" is like calling someone that is thin an "athlete." I agree that it is good for ministers to implore their congregations to take care of themselves -- physically, mentally and spiritually. However, if pastors were called to confront those in worship about eating too much, should they not also confront all sorts of other sins? There is a whole list of such sins that a pastor could mention in front of congregations. It is well within the call of a pastor to denounce and preach against sin -- including those which are wrongly considered "minor" in modern churches. But remember, not everything is always what it appears to be. And everything that we do should be motivated by pure love. Remember that Jesus did not cast out the prostitutes and tax collectors. He ate and sat with them. Why? Jesus wanted to bring them to the Kingdom.Scriptures about gluttony:I Timothy 4:81 Corinthians 6:19-20Philippians 4:5Daniel 1:12-17James 4:7Romans 8:1-4I John 2:15Galatians 5:13I Corinthians 3:16 :-)

sermonindex Aug 7, 2005

I meant no disrespect by my first post ... but having worked in the Medical field, I know that many have thyroid issues or are on steroids for many diseases, and just these two alone, will blow you up like a toad.If it's a medical condition, which oft times it can be, and a Pastor preaches on obesity, well, to tell you the truth, I've seen this happen and the people who "couldn't help it" were very-very hurt.Many years ago, a certain 'christian' college, wouldn't let "obese" people apply for admission.And things I've read about Moody's "big belly" and Spurgeon's cigar ... I just want to see what is in the inner man, to be a tad bit more important. Though things like adultry and a lot of others, like abortion, are big enough to merit reproofs/corrections, etc..There's a verse, that says, "if you find yourself given to gluttony, put a knife to your throat" ... now what do we do with that ?Or pluck out your eye, or cut off your hand ?I only see Jesus really rebuking the self-righteous, when He was here, in the flesh.And if we really focus on the First Commandment, to 1st Love God, with All our hearts, souls, minds, and strength and others as ourselves, the rest falls into place. Right ? Such a subject, that I guess, knowing so many beautiful on the inside folks who struggle with hormones, metabolism, etc. etc., I guess I just didn't see this on my burger-biggie list. No pun intended.Sorry for my flippant answers.Chanin, maybe I'm just tired ? Probably.

C
Christisking Aug 7, 2005

Chris,You said:"However, if pastors were called to confront those in worship about eating too much, should they not also confront all sorts of other sins? There is a whole list of such sins that a pastor could mention in front of congregations." My answer is yes, yes, yes a thousand times yes. This is just one on a very, very, very long list that happens to be on mind lately and that I've noticed particularly in the past couple of weeks. I would be happy to discuss other sins pastors shy away from confronting and would be interested in knowing what other sins others have noticed as well.You also said:"Remember that Jesus did not cast out the prostitutes and tax collectors. He ate and sat with them. Why? Jesus wanted to bring them to the Kingdom."This is also true, but we must remember that He also gave the stern and unwavering command to - go an sin no more.Granny Annie also brings ups a good point:"If it's a medical condition, which oft times it can be, and a Pastor preaches on obesity, well, to tell you the truth, I've seen this happen and the people who "couldn't help it" were very-very hurt."I think it would be a shame if a pastor did not verbally excuse such rare conditions and unavoidable circumstances when giving such a message or rebuke. If a pastor was not to do this, he in my opinion would be in error. A certain amount of tact and respect, as in all cases, must be observed. If one was to say "you now who you are, and God knows who you are, and the Holy Spirit knows who you are and if this does not apply to you based on some rare medical condition please bear with us for the sake of the edification and repentance of your fellow brothers and sisters."I have know of a few people who have such medical conditions and they are almost always very outspoken about the medication they take or thyroid problem they may have. I'm not sure this a reason to just be silent. But it is absolutely a reason to clearly state an exception to these people. And to clearly state an intention not to offend but to bring to repentance.

sermonindex Aug 7, 2005

I think you all brought out good points. Very good. One other thought I had, and I'm not trying to get in my silly-mode again, but down in the Bible Belt here, we have a Restaurant, that's an "All-You-Can-Eat" Buffet style place.Well, every Wednesday, if you have any form of Credentials, that you are a licensed Minister, you can eat for free.I don't think you could count the "skinny" Pastors on one hand, even though the joint is packed. Maybe that's another reason why it's not or can't be preached :-? .ChristisKing (that's for sure)You make a lot of good points too. How could we make a "list" of sins though ?The definition of "sin" is "to miss the mark", and that "mark" is the exact 'Image of the Son'.Rom 8:29 and others.That would be an infinite list, that's fer shur.I can't even list my own without feeling despair beyond being able to hold my head up, when I look at me, compared to "Him".But that's our goal though, like Paul said. Right ?

C
ccchhhrrriiisss Aug 7, 2005

Hi Christisking...!As mentioned in my earlier post, it is definitely a good thing for a man of God to denounce and preach against sin. This should always be done with the greatest compassion and with a broken heart. The man of God should hurt when he does this -- and never with a self-righteous attitude. As many preachers have often pointed out, Jesus "wept before he whipped." Jesus literally wept as he arrived to Jerusalem, longing to hold the people of Jerusalem in his arms. He did this just a short while before he pulled out the whip at the Temple (Luke 19:41-46). Leonard Ravenhill once said, "A preacher has no business using the whip unless he has wept uncontrollably for those to whom he preaches."You make a valid point about how many preachers fail to preach against certain sins for fear of upsetting or embarrassing a particular member (or group of members) of the congregation. I know of a church that suffers terribly from rampant gossip -- and the pastor privately admitted that he doesn't know what to do. If he confronts it, he feels that he will offend many away from the church. If he lets it go on, many people will continue to be hurt. So he is stuck in a dilemma...and he unfortunately does nothing.However, in your post, you state that obesity is a sin. It is not. Obesity is just a physical condition. And yes, that condition often comes as a result of a sin -- called gluttony. But obesity can also be the result of a bad selection of foods (such as junk food). Some metabolisms break down fatty foods rather quickly, while others may have slower metabolisms. Therefore, it is difficult to judge which person is obese because of diet or health, and which person is obese due to the sin of gluttony.In the same way, every person who suffers from AIDS cannot be judged as having contracted the disease via sinful actions. While in the United States, most people who suffer from AIDS contract the disease via sinful practices (sexual immorality, drugs, etc...) -- there are still many others who contracted that disease from other means (such as from a cheating spouse, hospital drug transfusion, a cop who poked his fingers on an infected needle, rape victims, etc...). In many third world nations, AIDS is often contracted through unclean needles at hospitals (in the US and Canada, a used needle is thrown away, but in Africa, the needles are often reused). Thus, it is impossible to make a "blanket statement" that all AIDS victims have contracted the disease because of their own sinfulness. So, should a person suffering from AIDS, or obesity, or lust, or a person that is pregnant with an illegitimate child, etc... be allowed to publicly worship? Of course they should! Why? Because only God knows the heart of a person! Who knows if that person is in the condition that they are in because of undisclosed sin? And who knows if that person has or has not repented? To view people in any other way can be damaging and lead to a prideful, judgmental or self-righteous attitude (Luke 18:10-14).If a pastor were to spend his time publicly and individually exposing every sin of every person in a congregation -- he would not have time to preach the Word! Instead, the pastor should publicly preach against sin as it is written in the Word. He should boldly and openly preach against sins of lust, gossip, gluttony, abortion, sexual immorality, spiritual indifference, etc... Yet he should do this with the greatest of love, so that like Jesus, he would want none to fall away. He should only expose people individually that are blatantly unrepentant -- or leading others astray (as in I Corinthians 5). Remember, there is a powerful yet subtle difference between conviction and condemnation. The Lord came to convict us of sin -- not condemn us in our sin (John 3:17).May God help us to have the same compassion and mercy for others as we need and desire for ourselves! Yes, we should love them enough to tell them the truth. But as Paul states, may God help us to "speak the truth in love" (Ephesians 4:15). When spoken with such agape love, it is difficult to misunderstand our motives. :-)

S
savedgrace Aug 7, 2005

Of course it is not a sin to be obese.If it is, would that imply that being fabulously fit and trim equates to being righteous? What if I am fabulously fit and trim because I throw all my energy into exercise and am obsessed with my body image?You need to look behind the body shape to what is inside the person's heart. What is first in their life? Are they looking to food or exercise to replace a God-shaped hole in their heart? ... and if they are, does that mean we throw them out of fellowship?Not having managed to get through a single day of my life without sin, I'm not going to cast the first stone. Grace

C
CHRISTian722 Aug 7, 2005

well..I am a nutrition major here so I may have a bit of a bias..lol..however..I wud like to point out some things...for one..obesity (not being overweight) is not necessarily genetic. You can have a predisposition to gain weight easily, but it will never take u to the lengths of obesity. In the same light...there are very thin people who are that way genetically, but never to the point of being unhealthy. I have noticed oainfully thin people who claim to have a "good metabolism" when in reality that is only partially true. These people also only eat as an average person, when their body is made to eat more than that. On the same token, obese people tend to eat more than the average person (I am speaking abt calories here not quantity or bulk of food. Both are unhealthy and are only made as such by lack of effort on the part of the person. However, it is true that obese people are certainly more susceptible to gaining weight. This is why taking an active role in taking care of the body is very important. It may not seem fair, but those are the casualties of life. there are certain things that different people have to deal with and they simply deal with them...that said.. There is simply no excuse for obesity...I do not mean to sound harsh at all..(and i hope that i do not)I think that you have brought to light, perhaps, some biases within the Christian community. We say that smoking is wrong because it is harmful to the body and addictive..and yet so is food...and so is not taking care of the body we have been given.

C
Compton Aug 7, 2005

Are they looking to food or exercise to replace a God-shaped hole in their heart?I don't know why but I suddenly have a craving for donuts! :-P Seriously, the distinction between gluttony and obesity is a keen one. Still, it is unmistakable the positive effect of simply eating better grade food.A friend of mine is convinced that the challenge of eating healthy is greater for people in poverty. He makes the case that it costs more money to eat healthy...cheaper food contains fat, sugars, and carbs. Poorer people can sometimes be heavier because they have less time and money to take care of themselves. While I'm not asking if anyone agrees completely...does anyone here have any sympathy for this idea?Just asking,MC

sermonindex Aug 7, 2005

How'd I wind up back here ? Anyhow, I liked so much what Chris had said, especially about the "tears of a Pastor".If there's no "weeping before the whipping", or however Chris put it, then they are not a Shepherd, but just a Puffed-up hireling. Compton, you've got a great point, since you asked... :-)When I met my husband, his Mom raised he and his siblings on junk food. She still lives on it.I've got him on cereal or whatever for breakfast, all fruit for lunch, and tons of it, then a healthy dinner, with not as much of the meat that he used to consume (as in a 1 LB steak per sitting :).Now, when he's at work with the guys, he sees what they eat "on the run", and he grieves inside for them.Most working people, 'are' on the run, and you are very right, that 'eating right' can get expensive ... but it can be weighed out in other ways ... but I think the 'time' factor for most part is a real issue.I worry more about people's health than their size.But, sometimes it also goes to the issue of depression with some people. They feel alone, not good enough for anybody, etc. etc. etc., and maybe if we just "fill that hole" that was brought up, and look deeper inside these folks, maybe we'd find out "WHY" they may be overweight, rather than painting them all with such a wide brush.People are Hurting inside, and each tends to that hurt, in different ways.It takes 'time' for God to come in and heal us from the inside out. Then we can feel worthy enough to "take care of ourselves". In America, we're told we 'have to' eat 3 times a day, plus snacks.Missionaries can go on one meal a day.I'll take that donut now MC :-D

C
CHRISTian722 Aug 7, 2005

A friend of mine is convinced that the challenge of eating healthy is greater for people in poverty. He makes the case that it costs more money to eat healthy...cheaper food contains fat, sugars, and carbs. Poorer people can sometimes be heavier because they have less time and money to take care of themselves. this is partially true but only becas modern society makes it much easier for us to be less active. If u are poor (as i was growing up) you may not have money to eat the commericalized stuff..but u can afford to eat healthy for the most part..um..also..u tend to eat less....But nowadays people are much MUCH less active than in times past. It is much easier to remain obese nowadays and it is not neccesarily anyone's fault...it is hard to walk places with the traffic and such..unless u live in NY ..lol

C
Compton Aug 7, 2005

If there's no "weeping before the whipping", or however Chris put it, then they are not a Shepherd, but just a Puffed-up hireling....People are Hurting inside, and each tends to that hurt, in different ways.This comment reminded me of a little episode with the friend I was talking about. One Sunday were at church in a prayer circle before worship when someone asked where a certain missing musician was. Because this absent fellow was quite overwieght, a few of the guys made some callous jokes about him probably being at McDonalds. At this point, my friend rebuked the whole lot of us. Having to fight to keep his own wieght off, he said with tears in his own eyes, "How touching that you are concerned about his wieght! Which one of you will be a brother and encourage him to lose wieght? Which one of you will get up early with him to help him stick to an exercise program?" He walked off the stage and left everyone feeling rightfully ashamed of their insensitivity.I'll take that donut now MC This reminds me of a childrens song by the "Donut Man." "Life without Jesus is like a donut." Knowing my kids, they would ask what kind...jelly or custard?

C
Compton Aug 7, 2005

CHRISTian722,As a nutritionist I thought you might find this Interesting.A friend from Hong Kong once complained to me about the invasion of American fast food in Asia. He told me that for the first time in thousands of years, obesity in China, especially among the youth, is on the rise.We discussed this at one of his favorite resturaunts over there...KFC. MC

C
CHRISTian722 Aug 7, 2005

lol!..yes!! becas the food has so much more calories here due to frying and additives and preservatives and all that jazz. Many foreigners say they gain weight when they come here even tho they eat the same portions. They are only able to lose the weight when they return to their native diets..lol..the Anerican diet- Fast Food!! :))

C
Compton Aug 7, 2005

Many foreigners say they gain weight when they come here even tho they eat the same portions.Has anyone here seen the documentary on McDonalds called "Supersize Me?" The filmaker decided to live on nothing but three Mcdonald's meals a day for 30 days while being monitored by a small team of health experts...and record the whole thing on film. The film claims that the food is chemically addicting and that it took 6 months to lose the the weight gained during the "experiment."

sermonindex Aug 7, 2005

I read the original post, but have not read thru all the responses... but here is my take on obese believers.Barring any medical conditions that cause people to be overweight (i.e. out of their control) being over weight is generally cause by one thing: gluttony. And the root sin of gluttony is: selfishness.I want that donut. I want my fries supersized. I hate working out.Eating can also be an addiction. Many many people eat to escape. We feel some sort of emotional pain... what soothes it? Ben & Jerry's ice cream. This is called idolatry.Now, having said this, we can not go around and look at people who struggle with weight and judge them. Why? Well, first off... how do you know they dont have a thyroid condition? And if they dont have one, we still should not sit in judgement on them if we see them getting in line for the 3rd time at the buffet because YOU may not have a problem controlling you eating... but you may have a problem controlling your TV. You may have a problem controlling your temper when you're driving. Etc.We certainly can approach someone we know who has a problem controlling their eating... doing so in love, and offering to help them over come it. I'm sure a lot of guilt goes along with this particular problem. Especially if someone has lost weight, and then put it back on plus another 10.Of all the issues in the church, this is probably one of the most wide spread problems... and the hardest to address without offending. God be with any pastor who attempts to deal with it in his fellowship.Krispy

sermonindex Aug 7, 2005

A friend of mine is convinced that the challenge of eating healthy is greater for people in poverty. He makes the case that it costs more money to eat healthy...cheaper food contains fat, sugars, and carbs. Poorer people can sometimes be heavier because they have less time and money to take care of themselves. There is plenty of research in the UK confirming the truth of your friend's theory. This is compounded by the cost of joining a gym, sports or leisure club, which is WAY beyond the pocket even of a non-smoking, non-drinking, honest Benefit claimant. My experience of controlling my weight rests entirely on DECIDING to control my weight. After that, no problem. For anyone on drugs or hormones or a low income, they have their back to the wall unless they are also educated, motivated and have enough time to overcome these extra difficulties. I agree with previous posts which have outlined the many reasons not everyone who is obese, can be accused of 'sin'.Just a word about nursing mothers... not only do women naturally carry a higher %fat than men, but successful nursing may depend on carrying extra weight too - although this is not a 'rule', as some people lose weight faster, because of nursing!

P
philologos Aug 7, 2005

I recall trying to help a Christian family who were struggling with the fact that their unmarried teenage daughter had become pregnant. It is very important to separate causes from effects in bringing a word from God to such settings. So I tried to spell it out like this; It is not sin to be having a child when you are unmarried. It is a natural consequence of something earlier. The sin was the relationship outside marriage; the pregnancy was the consequence. The shame is human shame, not conviction. God convicts of the sin; men judge the consequences.Obesity is not sin. The the cause of the obesity which probably took place in secret with no one to observe may well have been sin. Gluttony is a sin, but then gluttony is not the only cause of obesity. Men are very proficient at judging consequences; only the Spirit of God can convict the heart.

This discussion is locked.

Archived
1 of 71 posts