BSBKJVWEBYLTASVBBEWMBT4TDBY|HymnsMusicDonate
Menu
General

Has God predestined some for hell?

D
dougkristen Aug 24, 2005

I was having a discussion about this with someone and the question they asked was, "How can God create someone when He knew they were predestined for hell?"Thoughts? In Christ,Doug

sermonindex Aug 24, 2005

Yes, some."For the scripture saith unto Pharoah. EVen for this same purpose have I raised thee up, that I might shew my power in thee, and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth. There fore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth." (Romans 9:17-18)

sermonindex Aug 24, 2005

Yes, some."For the scripture saith unto Pharoah. EVen for this same purpose have I raised thee up, that I might shew my power in thee, and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth. There fore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth." (Romans 9:17-18)I am not necessarily disputing this as my grasp on scripture is probably loads behind you and probably a lot of people on this forum but I jsut find it really hard to believe that God would actually make a person in order that they would go to hell. I mean, Judas betrayed Jesus and because of that He went to the cross and died for us al but I can't believe that God needs man to carry out His purpose and that, if there hadn't been someone to betray Him then He wouldn't have been able to die for us. I guess what I am saying is that I can't believe that not every single person has a chance of eternal life as that wouldn't be fair.Sorry - I don't want to argue really I just don't understand and would stuggle with this concept.Liz

sermonindex Aug 24, 2005

I don't believe in Predestination ... but I believe in the ForeKnowledge of God.With Pharoah, God knew his heart and what he'd do.They say, the same sun that hardens clay - melts ice. It's the "heart condition" that either "hardens" under conviction of God or melts.God knew Pharoah's heart or what Pharoah would do.Nevertheless, it is all turned to the Glory of God, and His Purpose.Foreknowledge, is different from Predestination ... in that it shows us that we all still have a Freewill.If the Lord, speaks of something, like Judas, as the son of perdition, with foreknowledge ... knowing ahead what Judas would do in the end ... I don't think that he predestined him or created him to do that ... Just as HE did not create Satan to fall.Nor Adam.Freewill all the way.

sermonindex Aug 24, 2005

I agree with sermonindex... I think some are. Look at Hitler. Probably one of the most evil men in the history of mankind. Yet, God accomplished some things because of Hitler that has helped to bring about prophetic end times events. Best example is the creation of Israel, and the gathering together of the Jewish people from all corners of the earth. That would not have happened had it not been for WWII and Hitler.Krispy

T
taco Aug 24, 2005

Yes, some.but Paul said:"[God]would have all men to be saved, and come to the knowledge of the truth."This question is really an other way of looking at the arminianism/calvinism issue. Seems to have been covered many times here. I don't understand all the workings of God in election and predestination but I do know somthing of the heart of God as demonstrated in his son. Even though the jews crucified Christ according to the predtermined will of God (Peter's sermon in acts). The Lord's desire was to gather them as a hen gathers her chicks - but they would not come.

sermonindex Aug 24, 2005

I reckon, the two best Textbooks, used in Non-reformed theology Bible Colleges, would be "Elect in the Son" and "Life in the Son", by Robert Shank.It'd be hard to argue for predestination after reading them.though of course, it still goes on.

sermonindex Aug 24, 2005

I agree with sermonindex... I think some are. Look at Hitler. Probably one of the most evil men in the history of mankind. Yet, God accomplished some things because of Hitler that has helped to bring about prophetic end times events. Best example is the creation of Israel, and the gathering together of the Jewish people from all corners of the earth. That would not have happened had it not been for WWII and Hitler.I am not sure that I believe that Hitler was predestined for hell or that his heart state was any less qualified for salvation than the rest of us (meaning that none of us qualify). I believe that there would have been opportunity for even people like Hitler to repent. Sure I believe that God uses even the bad to bring good but not at the expense of someones possible salvation. I can't believe that God would look at someone and say to Himself 'oh that person may repent but, since I need him for a purpose that would condem him to hell then I will have to lose that one' Do you see what I mean? I reckon God would only use the people who He already knew had and would always reject Him in their hearts but not that they wouldn't have had the opportunity to accept Him.

sermonindex Aug 24, 2005

This is why I usually try to avoid discussion about perdestination... trying to understand the topic is like nailing jello to the wall. I am not a Calvinist. But I do believe God is in control, and has forknowledge.I dont know... I regret having gotten involved in this thread... LOLKrispy

M
Marc_W Aug 24, 2005

My thoughts....God is a legal God, therefore cannot maintain 'selective salvation' the devil has to play by Gods rules and God has to keep them too. It comes down to CHOICE, personal between light and darkness. Really it comes back to 'why did God put the tree of knowlegde in the garden' CHOICE, otherwise we would be mere puppets.God is a God of LOVE, therefore no evil can be in Him, to create for the purpose to destroy is not of God. Select salavation is not of God, its your personal choice and yours alone. Yes God knows, but He has done all He can to prepare the way thru His Son, the rest is up to you!God knows the heart from beginning to end, but still gives you every oppertunity to repent and turn. God would have it that NONE should perish, but cannot and will not deny you of your personal choice and right to choose for your self. Rom 1 says ALL have seen the Lord thru His creation, that none are without excuse!Blessing....

P
philologos Aug 24, 2005

Yes, some.??"For the scripture saith unto Pharaoh. EVen for this same purpose have I raised thee up, that I might shew my power in thee, and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth. There fore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth." (Romans 9:17-18) We have been around this topic so many times I initially thought I would steer clear of it, but there is an idea here (later confirmed by Krispy) that I would like to challenge.Firstly, there is no indication that Paul has personal salvation in mind when referring to Pharaoh; this is earthly destiny not eternal which is in view. The same is true of Esau, where the statement 'Esau have I hated was not declared until approx 1200 years after Esau was laid in his grave. In fact the original shows quite plainly that it is the 'nation' that sprung from Esau which is in prophetic view rather than the individual.The word 'harden' as relating to Pharaoh also needs some examination. Gen. 48:2 (KJVS)And one told Jacob, and said, Behold, thy son Joseph cometh unto thee: and Israel strengthened himself, and sat upon the bed. This is the word which is translated 'hardened' throughout the Exodus in relation to Pharaoh. It is, apparently, from a root which means to strengthen. The truth we see here is not that of 'a pre-scripted response' but that God 'strengthened' Pharaoh. It seems to me that Pharaoh fully made up his own mind and that God 'facilitated' this by giving Pharaoh the strength to go through with it.This concept may sound a little strange but if you recall the story of the prodigal son you will remember that it was the father who 'facilitated' the younger son's rebellion. He could not have taken his journey into the 'far country' unless he had been 'empowered' by his father. “And the younger of them said to his father, Father, give me the portion of goods that falleth to me. And he divided unto them his living. And not many days after the younger son gathered all together, and took his journey into a far country, and there wasted his substance with riotous living.” (Luke 15:12-13, KJVS) That does not mean that the father 'willed' it, anymore than it means that God 'willed' Pharaoh's rebellious stance. I feel sure that Pharaoh would have 'chickened out' from what he really wanted to do, but God strengthened his heart. The ultimate challenge in this whole concept is Satan himself. All created things are constantly sustained by God present power. Satan's choices are his own; he was not predestined to stage his rebellion. But his daily 'empowering' must come from the only source of life and power. These are mysterious things and we must take our comfort in that fact that God's thoughts are not ours. He is utterly just and righteous and good and gracious, and a day is coming when we may understand these things. But in the meantime I think we should be cautious about God having created some for eternal torment.

D
dann Aug 24, 2005

I believe God is sovereign in election - that is, that God chooses who goes to heaven and who goes to hell - and that this choice was made before the world was ever created - and furthermore that it was not that God 'looked forward' to see who would come to Christ - but that God determined beforehand exactly whom He would redeem, and whom He would not.Dan/\\/\\/\\

R
RobertW Aug 24, 2005

But in the meantime I think we should be cautious about God having created some for eternal torment.Any doctrine that we come up with must be entirely consistent with the whole of the revelation of God's divine attributes. If that doctrine is not consistent with the light we have concerning God, we must go back to the drawing board. Those who hold the doctrine of unconditional election ultimately make God the author of sin and the father of lies. The author of sin- because it must needs be that He had decreed it and the father of lies because the whole of our understanding of what it means to love has been twisted beneath our breast as such that what we esteem is evil is good and what we esteem as good is evil. This is the danger of ever considering God to have elected anyone to eternal damnation- especially apart from their own decision to choose 'this day' whom they would serve. It is all one big huge mockery if things are as preplanned and mechanical as this. Better would it be to say that the passages in question made no sense at all as to say they made a sense such as this. The whole doctrine leaves out many passages concerning man's responsibility to choose rightly and militates against the conscience. When we suggest that God is motivated by our definition of sovereignty first, and not that which we consciously understand to be genuine agape love, we have made Satan into God and God into Satan. If I cannot trust my faculties as I bring them into harmony with the history of man in scripture, then I may well not believe hell to be a bad place. But God's word is also a revelation of man's condition and we can use it to adjust our conscience alongside the Holy Spirit to have the mind of Christ. And with the Holy Spirit bearing witness in my heart I cannot accept that God had unconditionally damned anyone. If I defend God in great zeal let it be that I defend Him in His sovereign right to save man from sin who would come to Him in saving faith; but God forbid that I would zealously defend a God that would eternally damn sinners to a hell unconditionally when He has already said He is not willing that any perish- but that all come to repentance. If our doctrines don't jibe with II Peter 3:9 they have to be discarded and reworked.The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. (II Peter 3:9)God Bless,-Robert

sermonindex Aug 24, 2005

The thing about both the Hebrew or Greek words, unlike our English words, they seldom have just one definition. So it's important to look and see 'How Else' and 'Where Else', the particular word is used.Taking first ... Exo 4:21 And the LORD said unto Moses, When thou goest to return into Egypt, see that thou do all those wonders before Pharaoh, which I have put in thine hand: but I will harden H2388 his heart, that he shall not let the people go. Look up H2388 in your Strong's Dictionary, and see how many ways it can be interpreted.The ways and places are listed here ...H2388חזקchâzaqTotal KJV Occurrences: 309strong, 48Deu_11:8, Deu_31:6-7 (2), Deu_31:23, Jos_1:6-7 (2), Jos_1:9, Jos_1:18, Jos_10:25, Jos_17:13, Jdg_1:28, 1Sa_4:9, 2Sa_3:6, 2Sa_10:11 (2), 2Sa_11:25, 2Sa_16:21, 1Ki_2:2, 1Ch_22:12-13 (3), 1Ch_28:10, 1Ch_28:20, 2Ch_11:12, 2Ch_15:7, 2Ch_16:9, 2Ch_25:8, 2Ch_26:15, 2Ch_32:7, Ezr_9:12, Isa_28:22, Isa_35:4, Jer_51:12, Eze_22:14 (2), Eze_30:21, Dan_10:19 (2), Dan_11:5 (2), Dan_11:32, Nah_2:1, Nah_3:14, Hag_2:4 (3), Zec_8:9, Zec_8:13repaired, 392Ki_12:6, 2Ki_12:14, 2Ch_29:3, 2Ch_32:5, Neh 3:4-24 (27), Neh_3:27-32 (8)hold, 35Gen_19:16, Gen_21:18, Exo_9:2, Jdg_19:29, 1Sa_15:27, 2Sa_13:11 (2), 2Sa_18:9, 1Ki_1:50, 1Ki_2:28, 1Ki_9:9, 2Ki_2:12, 2Ch_7:22, Job_8:15, Job_27:6, Psa_35:2, Pro_3:18, Pro_4:13, Isa_4:1, Isa_27:5, Isa_41:13, Isa_42:6, Isa_56:2, Isa_56:4, Isa_64:6-7 (2), Jer_6:23-24 (2), Jer_8:5, Jer_8:21, Jer_50:42-43 (2), Zec_8:23 (2), Zec_14:13strengthened, 28Gen_48:2, Jdg_3:12, Jdg_7:11, 1Sa_23:16, 2Sa_2:7, 1Ch_11:10, 2Ch_1:1, 2Ch_11:17, 2Ch_12:13, 2Ch_17:1, 2Ch_21:4, 2Ch_23:1, 2Ch_25:11, 2Ch_26:8, 2Ch_28:20, 2Ch_32:5, Ezr_1:6, Ezr_7:28, Neh_2:18, Job_4:3, Psa_147:13, Eze_13:22, Eze_34:4, Dan_10:18-19 (3), Dan_11:6, Hos_7:15strengthen, 14Jdg_16:28, 1Ki_20:22, Ezr_6:22, Neh_6:9, Isa_22:21, Isa_33:23, Isa_35:3, Isa_54:2, Jer_23:14, Eze_7:13, Eze_16:49, Eze_30:24-25 (2), Eze_34:16hardened, 9Exo_7:13, Exo_7:22, Exo_8:19, Exo_9:12, Exo_9:35, Exo_10:20, Exo_10:27, Exo_11:10, Exo_14:8take, 9Psa_35:2, Pro_4:13, Isa_4:1, Isa_27:5-6 (2), Isa_56:4, Isa_64:7, Zec_8:23 (2)caught, 8Exo_4:4, 1Sa_17:35, 2Sa_2:16, 2Sa_18:9, 1Ki_1:50, 1Ki_2:28, 2Ki_4:27, Pro_7:13courage, 8Num_13:20, 2Sa_10:12, 1Ch_19:13, 2Ch_15:8, Ezr_10:4, Psa_27:14, Psa_31:24, Isa_41:6prevailed, 8Gen_47:20, 1Sa_17:50, 2Sa_24:4, 1Ki_16:22, 2Ki_25:3, 1Ch_21:4, 2Ch_8:3, 2Ch_27:5repair, 82Ki_12:5, 2Ki_12:7-8 (2), 2Ki_12:12, 2Ki_22:5-6 (2), 2Ch_24:5, 2Ch_34:8held, 6Jdg_7:20, Jdg_16:26, Neh_4:16-17 (2), Neh_4:21, Jer_50:33stronger, 62Sa_13:14, 1Ki_20:23 (2), 1Ki_20:25, Jer_20:7, Jer_31:11encouraged, 5Jdg_20:22, 1Sa_30:6, 2Ch_31:4, 2Ch_35:2, Isa_41:7taken, 51Ki_9:9, Isa_41:9, Jer_6:24, Jer_8:21, Mic_4:9encourage, 4Deu_1:38, Deu_3:28, 2Sa_11:25, Psa_64:5harden, 4Exo_4:21, Exo_14:4, Exo_14:17, Jos_11:20sore, 4Gen_41:56-57 (2), 2Ki_3:26, Jer_52:6taketh, 4Deu_25:11, Isa_51:17-18 (2), Isa_56:6took, 4Jdg_19:25, 2Sa_15:5, 2Ch_28:15, Jer_31:32calkers, 2Eze_27:9, Eze_27:27confirm, 22Ki_15:19, Dan_11:1courageous, 2Jos_23:6, 2Sa_13:28fortified, 22Ch_11:11, 2Ch_26:9help, 22Ch_29:34, Job_8:20holdeth, 2Job_2:3, Dan_10:21mighty, 22Ch_13:21, 2Ch_27:6prevail, 2Job_18:9, Dan_11:7retained, 2Jdg_7:7-8 (2), Jdg_19:4withstand, 22Ch_13:7-8 (2)aided, 1Jdg_9:24amend, 12Ch_34:10became, 12Ch_27:6behave, 11Ch_19:13clave, 1Neh_10:29confirmed, 12Ki_14:5constant, 11Ch_28:7constrained, 12Ki_4:8continued, 1Neh_5:16courageously, 12Ch_19:11established, 12Ch_25:3fasten, 1Jer_10:3-4 (2)fastened, 1Isa_41:7force, 1Deu_22:25fortify, 1Nah_3:14harder, 1Jer_5:3holden, 1Isa_45:1leaneth, 12Sa_3:29maintain, 11Ch_26:27men, 12Sa_10:12mend, 12Ch_24:12obtain, 1Dan_11:21received, 12Ch_4:5recovered, 1Isa_39:1relieve, 1Lev_25:35retain, 1Job_2:9retaineth, 1Mic_7:18seized, 1Jer_49:24stout, 1Mal_3:13strength, 11Ch_29:12sure, 1Deu_12:23urgent, 1Exo_12:33valiantly, 11Ch_19:13If we say, that châzaq, does not mean Harden(ed), than that would contradict Romans 9:18, and Scripture never contradicts Scripture.The word for "hardeneth" used in the N.T. and in this Rom. 9:18 is G4645 - sklērunō, which always is translated and defined as ..... harden, 3Heb_3:8, Heb_3:15, Heb_4:7hardened, 2Act_19:9, Heb_3:13hardeneth, 1Rom_9:18This is called "word studies" not "word games".Although I do like Scrabble a lot. 8-)

R
RobertW Aug 24, 2005

Again, he limiteth a certain day, saying in David, To day, after so long a time; as it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts. (Hebrews 4:7)Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth. (Romans 9:18)How can we reconcile these?Man's role in his own hardening is that he/she resists the Holy Ghost. Genesis 6 states that God's Spirit will not always strive with man for he is also mortal. Man resists as his role and God ceases to strive as His role in the hardening process. TODAY if you will hear His voice harden not your hearts. How do we harden? By always resisting the Holy Ghost. Resisting the Holy Ghost makes for fallow ground. The drier the heart the harder the heart until it all becomes as 'dust'. Who did the hardening? Pharoah? YES! or God? YES! Pharoah resisted the Holy Ghost until God obliged him and left him to himself. Left to himself man is capable of anything. Man without a conscience is not an animal he is a devil. What happens? Man says God I don't like you in my thoughts- so God says OK, then I'll leave. And when He leaves man is 'given over' to a reprobate mind to 'do' those things that are not convenient- no mattter what the context or situation. They do what they would not have done had they been restrained by the Holy Spirit. Hardening as I see it is the extinguishing of the voice of God and God responding to that extinguishing by complying with the sinners will. my Spirit will not ALWAYS strive- therefor TODAY if you will hear His voice- harden not your heart. God Bless,-Robert

M
Marc_W Aug 24, 2005

Praise God Dan that your not God, no offense intended ;-) If there was predestined salvation, whats the point in serving God, your either saved or doomed either way, I mean, you can't get in and you can't get out, so either way you might as well let your flesh rule! Calv's list, on or off! No, no, no , no - this can't be so! The Word clearly says Jesus died for all! All that would recieve the Son would have Life and life eternal!Phew..... thank God for His loving mercy, grace and kindness!By the way, if you think your called to be saved over those that are called to be cast into hell, how do you know your on the "in list" over the "out list?" Maybe your just wasting what little time you have serving a ruthless God :-o Again, no offense intended, just trying to make point, in-love I hope :-)

M
markitats Aug 24, 2005

If there was predestined salvation, whats the point in serving GodTo answer your question; because God is worthy to be served even if at the end of the road we go to hell. The lamb that was slain is worthy to be lived for regardless of what happens at judgment. I know these are hard words, but the truth. If we simply live for Jesus based upon the presupposition that we will go to Heaven at the end of the road that seems pretty selfish. Not that we shouldn’t expect to because we have that blessed promise, but again, it’s not about you and I, but Gods glory. Blessings!

P
philologos Aug 24, 2005

I don't want to get into another wrangle but in the interests of scripture interpretation let me try to explain how we learn the use of Bible words. The Hebrew word chazaq is used, according to my Accordance Software, 290 times. The following list will give you a feel for the word. As you say, many words have more than one meaning, and it sometimes takes more than one word to translate another. This little list will show that of all the ideas that are built into chazaq some predominate in the OT translation. Total number of verses = 266 (total number of verses displayed = 266) [KEY H2388] (290 total words) aided = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 amend = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 calkers = 2 H2388 chazaq caught = 5 H2388 chazaq = 5 clave = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 confirm = 2 H2388 chazaq = 2 confirmed = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 constant = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 constrained = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 continued = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 courage = 8 H2388 chazaq = 8 courageous = 2 H2388 chazaq = 2 courageously = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 encourage = 4 H2388 chazaq = 4 encouraged = 5 H2388 chazaq = 5 established = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 fasten = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 fastened = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 force = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 fortified = 2 H2388 chazaq = 2 fortify = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 harden = 4 H2388 chazaq = 4 hardened = 9 H2388 chazaq = 9 harder = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 held = 6 H2388 chazaq = 6 help = 2 H2388 chazaq = 1 H2388 chazaq hold = 35 H2388 chazaq = 35 holden = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 holdeth = 2 H2388 chazaq = 2 leaneth = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 maintain = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 men = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 mend = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 mighty = 2 H2388 chazaq = 2 obtain = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 prevail = 2 H2388 chazaq = 2 prevailed = 8 H2388 chazaq = 8 received = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 recovered = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 relieve = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 repair = 8 H2388 chazaq = 8 repaired = 39 H2388 chazaq = 39 retain = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 retained = 2 H2388 chazaq = 2 retaineth = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 seized = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 sore = 4 H2388 chazaq = 4 stout = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 strength = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 Strengthen = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 strengthen = 13 H2388 chazaq = 13 strengthened = 28 H2388 chazaq = 28 strong = 48 H2388 chazaq = 48 stronger = 5 H2388 chazaq = 5 sure = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 taken = 2 H2388 chazaq = 2 taketh = 3 H2388 chazaq = 3 took = 4 H2388 chazaq = 4 urgent = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 valiantly = 1 H2388 chazaq = 1 withstand = 2 H2388 chazaq = 2Of the 290 times the English OT has opted for words linked with 'harden' about 14 times. While words directly linked to 'strengthen' count for almost a 100 instances. Not only that, but the word is sometimes translated, help, encourage,confirm, help, hold, fortify etc account for most of the others. It is plain from this predominance that the translators usually sought for a word along the lines of 'making strong' when they wanted an English word for chazaq.This would agree with the general understanding of chazaq2388. chazaq, khaw-zak´; a primitive root; to fasten upon; hence, to seize, be strong (figuratively, courageous, causatively strengthen, cure, help, repair, fortify), obstinate; to bind, restrain, conquer:—aid, amend, x calker, catch, cleave, confirm, be constant, constrain, continue, be of good (take) courage(-ous, -ly), encourage (self), be established, fasten, force, fortify, make hard, harden, help, (lay) hold (fast), lean, maintain, play the man, mend, become (wax) mighty, prevail, be recovered, repair, retain, seize, be (wax) sore, strengthen (self), be stout, be (make, shew, wax) strong(-er), be sure, take (hold), be urgent, behave self valiantly, withstand.Now what about Rom 9:18? sklErunO certainly means to 'harden' but it is interesting to note that Paul is almost certainly quoting Exodus. In fact, this is the word ,sklErunO, which is used in Exodus 4:21 in the Septuagint that Paul almost certainly had in mind at this point in Romans. This brings us to an important biblical concept. That Bible words do not have definitions, so much as histories. This is the kind of phenomena we find when we examine a word like 'metanoia' meaning repentance. If we just took the Greek dictionary definition of the word we would conclude that the word means a 'change of mind'. But if we consider its history we discover that the word is used in the Septuagint to translate the Hebrew word nacham; but nacham means much more than a 'change of mind' it has anguish in it, a gasp, a sigh, a groan. The whole sense of grief which is missing from the Greek word is found in the Hebrew word. This means that whenever we examine a Greek word we need not only to find its definition but to ascertain how a Hebrew would have used it. The NT use of metanoia always has the acquired Hebrew sense of 'grief' within it.Similarly, I would suggest, that when sklErunO is used to translate 'chazaq' we must carry into our understanding of 'harden' the acquired Hebrew sense of 'strengthen'. It is probably instructive that the NT only ever uses the word 'sklErunO' in the terms of heart responses.Acts 19:9 (KJVS)But when divers were hardened, and believed not, but spake evil of that way before the multitude, he departed from them, and separated the disciples, disputing daily in the school of one Tyrannus. Rom. 9:18 (KJVS)Therefore hath he mercy on whom he will have mercy, and whom he will he hardeneth. Heb. 3:8 (KJVS)Harden not your hearts, as in the provocation, in the day of temptation in the wilderness: Heb. 3:13 (KJVS)But exhort one another daily, while it is called To day; lest any of you be hardened through the deceitfulness of sin. Heb. 3:15 (KJVS)While it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts, as in the provocation. Heb. 4:7 (KJVS)Again, he limiteth a certain day, saying in David, To day, after so long a time; as it is said, To day if ye will hear his voice, harden not your hearts. It is important to remember that when the NT uses the word 'sklErunO' it is against an OT understanding of that concept, and the OT concept includes the sense of 'being strengthened'.

sermonindex Aug 24, 2005

Oh shucks, I signed back on to compliment Robert for his bang-up job and here's my buddy Philo.Philo ~ 'Context-comparative' - "Only Scripture can interpret Scripture and never Contradicts itself ... anywheres."So again ...If we say, that châzaq, does not mean Harden(ed), than that would contradict Romans 9:18, and Scripture never contradicts Scripture.The word for "hardeneth" used in the N.T. and in this Rom. 9:18 is G4645 - sklērunō, which always is translated and defined as ..... harden, 3Heb_3:8, Heb_3:15, Heb_4:7hardened, 2Act_19:9, Heb_3:13hardeneth, 1Rom_9:18Marc & Clueless did a good job too, besides Robert, who explained it best.The same sun that "hardens" Clay, Melts "ICE".And again, I recommend Shank's books.Adios Amigo.Hasta tonight-o.Te Amo mucho.(and what my 2 grandbabies call me Robert :)...Grannie Annie

R
RobertW Aug 24, 2005

(and what my 2 grandbabies call me Robert :)...Grannie AnnieNow I get it.

This discussion is locked.

Archived
1 of 32 posts