Brother sb1175Dude, i said too much. I wait eaegerly to be corrected because i am sure there might be questionable things written. We will see.I don't think so. You brought forward some very good points, which I will highlight. Just for your info, I'm a sis (Acts 9:36) and I appreciate the time you took to make such a big reply. Also, I didn't write the piece above. On the front page of SI, there is on the right, a new article is available every time the home page is called up. This was one of them and I chose to bring it up for discussion, precisely because I didn't agree with the basic premise that the Christ life is in harmony with our nature.However, I can see there is a different way of looking at 'our nature' which would make it more like Christ (than less like Christ), namely remembering that when we were made in God's image, and Christ was born of woman as well as God, He was identifying with our nature. What He was not doing at the point of His birth was identifying with our sin - He did that at His death. The question remains though, whether the invitation given in the article, which does not mention sin, (although the scripture given is 'I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live') is a fair repost? How can a person accept to be identified with the crucifixion of Christ, and at the same time the following be true? "Your personality is incomplete without Christ. Christ was made for you, and you were made for Christ, and until you meet Him you are not complete.Will not the person who receives such a thought, struggle with embracing the cross?It is clear from the analogy of the gas burning and the snowflake nurturing new life, that the speaker understands the principle, but I keep returning to the question of whether the last quote is compatible with the truth?You saidFirst and foremost, Christ was never made for us. Christ is sufficent by Himself, whether humans existed or not, or the World did or not. He still is part of that God-Head- that ever was, is and be. John 6 i think it is, makes clear of that matter. That passage from Colossians does not necessiate that the World be created for Christ's existence, ...i can't emphasize how much of the property of God we are(property- really for a lack of a better word). I believe we could say we are not property of God- if God didn't demand of all Human beings and for that matter all Creation- that all submit and behold His glory- that God actually demands worship out of everything that He ever created,will create and has created. ...I need Christ first and foremost- not so that my sins are forgiven - NO, it is SO THAT I MAY KNOW THE ONLY TRUE GOD, AND JESUS CHRIST THE SON. I only say that because, hypothetically speaking- if Sin did not render the relationship between God and every other being related to God dead- we would not need a Savior. But we do, and that Savior is not there foremost to give a cleansing- for the sake of Cleansing- he is there to restore what belongs to the Father back to Him. Amen to all these points you made, particularly the establishment of God's order. I like the feeling of security this gives to the whole plan of salvation... that God will have His heart's desire and people can choose to be part of it or not. Tragically - or not.