Hi GrannieAnnie...!No, Ravenhill nor Wilkerson's "cuts" were never done stealthfully.They'd yell, "appear impolite" at times, and you knew right where they stood, or where you stood with them.They never hid behind polite platitudes, and neither did Jesus, nor Paul, or our O.T. Prophets.Just because a person is loud or outspoken, it doesn't mean that they are correct. And just because a person speaks with a more gentle answer does not mean that they have a "hidden agenda" or are hiding behind "polite platitudes." In fact, the manner in which we speak has nothing to do with the power of the word that is given. It is wrong to judge the hearts of people by such outward mannerisms. Yes, Jesus and the apostles might sometimes have appeared "impolite" with their words -- but only to those who were spiritually divisive and manipulative. And they only spoke what they were certain were the Words of God. It was void of error or human opinion. In other words, it was indisputable truth. On such things, there can be no Biblical argument or disagreement. In fact, even children were drawn to such words of Christ. But what about men and women who share what they think they have heard or learned from God? What happens when a person loudly preaches his own spiritual and theological opinion -- and then treats those who do not agree like they are spiritually deceived? That has happened on occasion here at SermonIndex. Usually, the most blatant examples of such people are dealt with quickly and suddenly become "anonymous." There have been people who have "prophesied" all sorts of things in the name of God -- but were obviously speaking their own controversial opinion or theology. They were loud, outspoken and abrasive -- yet they truly believed that they were speaking for God. Regardless of how loud or abrasively they spoke, it still did not make their words true.I have no problem with people who are loud or "say things like it is." They should always be allowed to even shout a topic -- as long as they are speaking undeniable truth for the purpose of edification with real compassion, meekness and love. In fact, I am drawn to those who preach and teach in such a manner. They speak the truth boldy in love and humility. But I hurt when people speak with such a manner as "I am right and you are wrong" -- especially when the truth is still unclear. Some people have acted as though they hold a monopoly on truth and Biblical research. Sometimes, they act in such a way as to make it appear that those who disagree are either spiritually immature, spiritually deceived, or perhaps lost. Such spiritual arrogance is often rooted in pride, and is not something that the Lord would commend us for. There are several threads about false spiritual authoritarianism by some church leaders. But the same type of spiritual pride can extend even to well-meaning believers. If someone disagrees with them on a topic or issue, they accuse them of being deceived or having itching ears.David Wilkerson has sometimes been very outspoken. But he once wrote that he regretted some of the things that he had said or written in the past. David Wilkerson is not the same man he was in 1959 (or 1969, 1979 or 1989). Like everyone else, he is also growing and maturing in the faith. As he matures, his understanding of doctinal issues might change as well (he used to preach that New York City is the Babylon of Revelation 17-18 -- but I am not certain what he preaches now). I imagine that the same is true for everyone. We have all said something that we later regretted. This reminds us of our own fallible humanity, and our need for the grace of God. It also reminds us of our need to "test everything" (I Thessalonians 5:21). The Word of God is clear that we should be "swift to hear, slow to speak, and slow to wrath" (James 1:19-20). Again, we are reminded in Proverbs that "A soft answer turneth away wrath: but grievous words stir up anger" (Proverbs 15:1). This reminds us of the heart of God. Yes, Christ might have sounded very harsh when he spoke to certain Pharisees, Sadducees and the Teachers of the Law. But he only spoke those unmistakable truths with compassion, meekness and love. I know that it sounds clichéd, but Jesus "wept before he whipped." He wept over Jerusalem with deep sorrow -- wanting to gather the city as a hen gathers its chicks. I really don't think that there is anything wrong with being gentle with your answers. Likewise, not everyone that uses gentle answers is attempting to "hide their digs under the frosting sweetness that camouflages those digs from others, so that they are seen as "Christ-like" while making others look "not so". To accuse someone of such (or of being a part of the "evil American/Babylonian system") is to judge them without knowing their heart. And it is wrong to be prejudiced against such gentleness. In fact, Paul preferred using gentleness (I Corinthians 4:20). Like Jesus, Paul used a verbal whip only to confront blatant hypocrisy or obvious sin -- not those who honestly disagree on an issue of doctrine.I am certain that most of the people that frequent the forums truly desire to know the truth. To say otherwise would be judging them unrighteously. Yet, for all of the issues that we agree on, posters in the forums often disagree on many others. I think that this would be true about any two people. I imagine that it would be difficult to find two believers that agreed on everything. It is important that we agree on what is important. We can all agree on the need for salvation, prayer, fasting, the importance of holiness, evangelism, etc... But there are other topics that we can disagree on without ending our fellowship. We can either view those who disagree with our particular doctrinal views with suspicion, or we can use the opportunity to learn and test the perspectives of other people. Even though I do not always practice it, I am trying to do the latter.Recently, I have stopped posting as often in the forums. It is not because I don't have something to say, but because I felt "attacked" for sharing my opinions or views on certain issues by a certain small group of believers. It is not a pleasant experience to have your motives questioned in a public forum of believers. And it is not fun to be improperly judged because my views differed somewhat on certain (usually insignificant) issues, or by the manner in which I post. My girlfriend, Mireya, has sometimes visited the forums. But she is turned off by the divisiveness or accusations that sometimes take place. I have chosen to remain because I enjoy the fellowship, and I really enjoy the messages that are provided for download. But I sometimes wonder how many others are offended or turned off by such conflict. Annie, I pray that you know that my words are sincere. There is no "hidden agenda" to defend myself (or America) within my heart or words. The Lord knows my heart (even the innermost parts), and He knows the sincerity and depth at which I am willing to "give up anything and everything" to follow Him. I know who I am in Christ -- and I know how far that I have to go. And I am certain that you write such things with true compassion. You have spent much time in the past in an attempt to make certain that I understand your words (either through PMs, email, or in the forums). I truly appreciate that concern -- and that display of love. I have learned alot from so many of you (especially you, Grannie). Please continue to pray for me. I am growing -- but I still have so far to grow. :-)