Christisking
Nov 20, 2005
Too bad Bush didn't have guts to attend an illegal house church in China. Attending a government sanctioned three-self church is no big feat. Everyone one in China is allowed to attend and worship at such a church.How about issuing strict economic and trade sanctions until all pastor are set free? Now that might make a statement.
Christisking
Nov 20, 2005
Mike,I understand what you are saying Mike, but you are missing what I am trying to say. Bush going to a three-self church is absolutely a slap and spit in the face to the house church Christians and the pastors who are sitting in prisons and labor camps at this very moment for standing up against the three-self church. It is times like these that we should all hang our heads in shame for being Americans and having a man like Bush represent us as our president - for he is in terrible error endorsing the very thing the Christians in China are standing up against and refusing to be part of. How dare President Bush attend a communist approved three-self church. We need to stand with our brothers and sisters in Christ who are being persecuted not slap and spit in their faces by endorsing what they are standing up against. What an embarrassment! :oops:
Christisking
Nov 20, 2005
Quote:"I'd say its about the most the man can do."How about saying "We are stopping all trade with China PERIOD! We refuse to do ANY business with a country who persecutes Christians!!" and not endorsing the very thing the imprisoned pastors and church members are in jail for standing up against and thus spitting in there faces? Is slapping the faces of persecuted Christians by endorsing what they are persecuted for standing against the best you think you a man can do?It has nothing to do with political affiliation. For I have none. Republicans are just as bad as democrats and democrats are just as bad as republican, both are evil to the core. I would rebuke any politician who dared do such a thing to persecuted brother and sisters in Christ regardless of their political affiliation.
Christisking
Nov 20, 2005
Quote:"i'm unsure really what bush can do here but i can bet that most people in America wouldn't want to give up getting something from walmart for $3 if it means getting it for $5 or $6 for any reason."How sick and twisted can a nation become. How embarrassing for anyone who is an American and especially the American church. :-?
Christisking
Nov 21, 2005
hredii,From what you are saying we are never allowed to criticize the actions of any political leaders ever. I have heard this position before and I respect it. Now for me since I have no political affiliation I happen to think both Bill Clinton and George Bush are equally terrible, evil and disgusting men. It would be a shame, in my opinion, for either of theses men to call themselves by the name of Christ, and agree with you that we should not spend our time bashing political leaders continually, but to comment on recent actions in the news I feel is fine. Now the only way you can tell someone else based on scripture to not comment negatively on the action of our current president without being a hypocrite, is to not have every commented negatively on the actions of any of our presidents. Did you ever comment negatively on the actions of Bill Clinton? How about Ted Kennedy or John Kerry - both prominent political leaders? Did you give thanks for Bill Clinton before men in your conversations when he was president?This would also have to apply all world leader both past and present, not just current American presidents. Have you ever commented negatively on the actions of any of the following? Do you give thanks before men in your conversations of the following Kings and leaders?Hu Jintoa - ChinaFidel Castro - CubaAdolph Hitler StalinMussoliniAyatollah Kommani - IranKim Il Sung - North KoreaMuammar Qaddafi - LibiaNow I understand that all of these men are in position of authority because they were allowed to be there or put there by God, for His purpose, even if we don't understand what that purpose is. Jesus said Pilate and Herod were given there authority by God and these were both certainly evil men. Nebuchaadnezzar was evil and put in power by God specifically to bring judgment against Israel and there may be an evil leader who was put in power to specifically bring judgment against American. But I don't think that Scripture teaches that we are never allowed to comment negatively about the actions of any political leader.If your position is that we are never to comment negatively on the actions of any political leader and you have never made (or repent for and stopped) any negative comments on any of the post mentioned men, then I respect your position and will prayerfully search for God to revile to me His will on this matter. But, if have talked negatively about any of the above mentioned men and have not given thanks for them in your conversations before men, then I would have to humbly and respectful submit that you are being a hypocrite. I am not trying to be disrespectful or to condemn you, but in Christian love encourage you to remove the plank from your own eye, if in fact this is the case. Now again I highly respect the opinion that we are never to talk bad about any political leader and would like to hear from anyone who holds this opinion. What I have a problem with is people who bad mouthed Bill Clinton or Sodom Hussain at every chance they get or with no thought of the matter, but pull out these Scriptures to stop anyone who comments negatively on the actions of a leader of their particular political persuasion.