by inotof on 2005/12/7 22:04:55I wonder would someone care to elaborate on the differences between condemnation from the devil and conviction from God? We have got ourselves into an amazing muddle by not using words properly in their biblical context. The first thing to note is that 'condemnation' has absolutely nothing to do with the way we feel. It is a law-court term, and the law-court is not overmuch concerned about how you 'feel'. It wants to know your actions and your motives; everything else is outside its domain.The Greek word for 'condemn' (katakrinO) means to 'thoroughly judge'. It is used in approx 20+ times in the New Testament (Matt. 12:41-42; 20:18; 27:3; Mark 10:33; 14:64; 16:16; Luke 11:31-32; John 8:10-11; Rom. 2:1; 5:16,18; 8:1,3,34; 14:23; 1Cor. 11:32; Heb. 11:7; James 5:9; 2Pet. 2:6) and is usually translated 'condemn' in the KJV.Unfortunately the trail gets a bit confusing because the KJV also translates another word by the English words 'condemn/condemnation'. This is the word 'krinO' and it is translated as 'condemn' in Luke 23:40; John 3:17; 1Cor. 11:34; 1Tim. 3:6; James 3:1; Jude 1:4, and this can really confuse the issue. It really should be translated 'judge' or 'judgment'.A Roman law court had various stages in its operation.1. accusation2. verdict3. sentence4. executionThe 'judging' was an earlier stage in the process, while the 'condemning' was at the end of the process. The progress can be seen in “And not as it was by one that sinned, so is the gift: for the judgment {krima-judgment) was by one to condemnation (katakrima-condemnation), but the free gift is of many offences unto justification.” (Rom. 5:16, KJVS) Here the 'judgement' results in 'condemnation' which is the sentence/execution, and the end of the process.As a result of 'justification by faith' which is the judicial pronouncement of 'not guilty as charged' the whole process comes to an end. With a 'not guilty' verdict the law's interest and authority ends, and the 'accused' can walk out of the court 'made free'. For those who are justified by faith there is literally 'no condemnation'. 'Condemnation' being the follow-on stages when a 'guilty, as charged' verdict (judgment) has been given. The legal process thus comes to an end and there is 'no condemnation'.Satan, who is not the judge, has no power of condemnation. He is the accuser of the brethren but has no authority to judge, sentence or execute. What most Christians call 'condemnation' is actually 'accusation'. Only God has the power to judge and to sentence.I suspect that none of this will actually help you! But if you can call things by their proper biblical names it will certainly help you to ask the right questions and thereby get the right answers. The question you are really asking is 'how can I distinguish between Satan's accusation and God's conviction.'? The difference can often be discerned by checking the motives. Satan only comes "to steal, and to kill, and to destroy". His accusations have no 'remedial' purpose in them. He just wants to crush you because that is the only way he can get at God. God, on the other hand, wants to forgive and to change and to heal you, or if you want it in Bible words... He comes"'that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly." Consequently God 'conviction' is always to bring us to repentance. God never says 'repent' without telling us what to do about it, Satan will accuse and tell you that there is no remedy.