peculiar that a mindset has developed that these things are 'needed' or are great 'evangelism' tools etc. etc. It just gets all out of whack, the scriptures are anything but boring, needing all these props and whatnot, that is the problem all these replacements for the foolishness of preaching and just some plain old fashoned contemplation...crsschk:You're right; they aren't necessarily needed, even Lewis would say that; however, it was an outlet for him to express what God meant to Him.Lewis had already been fighting hard in the trenches for Christianity, going toe-to-toe with the great minds of his day (there's a great book that compares Lewis vs. Freud by Armand Nicholi which can be found if googled under "Lewis vs. Freud"). He retired into the world of the imagination only towards the end of his life.I'm also in the camp of wanting to see the church enlightened, invigorated, and impassioned with God, hating the shallow thinking (or just plain thoughtlessness) that pervades the Western hemisphere Christians. We feel contented to hide behind veils of pleasure and comfort, and then wonder why an atheist, pagan or agnostic can throw the scriptures (in twisted fashion, of course) in our faces and watch us quiver. I find that really irritating.Yet, I myself have begun writing a fictional tale, because I sometimes find that you can cry on the rooftops of fantasy a lot louder than in modern neighborhoods (or that might be because in a small town no one is outside to listen :-P ). We must remember that most of Ancient history consists of story telling. Scops, or story tellers, would pick up a lyre and sting out tales of battles, wars, and (yes) religion. That's what the Psalms are, and that's what the women did when they cried, "Saul slayed his thousands, and David his ten thousands..."...Yet, I must agree with what Lewis says about there always being two equal and opposite errors we can fall into--much like having two ditches on each side of a road.On one side, there's prosaic simplicity, which has no room for anything imagined or fanciful (and, dare I say it, supernatural--literally "over nature"). This road leads to problems when looking at Daniel and John's relation of metaphysical symbols, such as dragons, beasts, etc. A prosaic mind cannot develop a picture, like an artist with no brush.(this mindset seems more naturalistic and atheistic than anything else).The other is the pagan mind. It is full of demons, dragons, ghouls, and goblins (or faeries, fauns, centaurs, and nymphs) all floating about in a cauldron of caves, castles, forests, and seas. This mind looks down on the practical, having eyes only for that which is full of emotion and mystery. Such a mind leads a man to bemoan any ordinary or mundane element of life (and have little commitment since this mindset can't stand being tied to something when passion dies).Yet, we know that Satan cannot create anything on his own power, but must pervert and contort the blessings God has bestowed upon us. The power of the imagination is God's gift to arouse in us a desire for the pure and excellent Nature (Over-Nature) He intended us to live in. The practical side must accompany this to keep us rooted in both conviction and commitment--thus, enabling us to dream and obey.I hope this helps answer some questions.In Christ,Benjamin